Mass in eV over speed of light

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the conversion of mass and energy units in the context of quantum mechanics, specifically when solving the Schrödinger equation. Participants clarify that mass can be expressed in electronvolts (eV) and that using natural units simplifies calculations, where both mass and energy share the same units. The importance of consistency in units is emphasized, particularly when dealing with moving particles, and the distinction between rest mass and relativistic mass is highlighted. The recommended approach is to utilize MeV or GeV for particle masses and to adopt natural units for ease of computation.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of quantum mechanics and the Schrödinger equation
  • Familiarity with natural units in high-energy physics
  • Knowledge of relativistic and non-relativistic mass concepts
  • Basic proficiency in unit conversion between eV, MeV, and GeV
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the application of natural units in high-energy physics
  • Learn about the Dirac equation and its implications for relativistic particles
  • Explore the relationship between kinetic energy and momentum in quantum mechanics
  • Investigate the differences between SI, Gaussian, and Heaviside-Lorentz units in electrodynamics
USEFUL FOR

Physicists, students of quantum mechanics, and anyone involved in particle physics calculations will benefit from this discussion, particularly those working with the Schrödinger equation and unit conversions in high-energy contexts.

Avatrin
Messages
242
Reaction score
6
Hi!
I know the mass of, for instance, an electron can be express in units of electronvolts over speed of light squared. However, I am not sure how to use it. When I have to calculate \frac{\sqrt{2mE}}{\hbar}, do I have to multiply m with the speed of light squared to get it in meters per second squared? Or, divide? Yes, I am a little confused.

PS. Energy is given in electronvolts, and Planck's reduced constant is given in electronvolt seconds.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Okay, but, E is in electronvolts. Also, I have other constants that I need to calculate as well. Would you recommend me to convert all potentials and energies to joules?

Lets say that is not possible. It is exam, and I have to write a code on paper that works (which does happen here).
 
Starting with E = mc2, then m = E/c2, and one can express E in eV, or MeV, and divide it by c2.

So mE leads to (E/c2), or (E/c)2.

Note k = p/ħ

Units should be consistent.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: bhobba
Can I do that? I mean, isn't that only valid if my particle is not moving? My particle is moving. I think the mass I am using is the rest mass, but the energy certainly is not that of a still particle.

I should probably provide some context; I encounter this issue whenever I have to program some solution to the Schrödinger equation.
 
Avatrin said:
Can I do that? I mean, isn't that only valid if my particle is not moving? My particle is moving. I think the mass I am using is the rest mass, but the energy certainly is not that of a still particle.

I should probably provide some context; I encounter this issue whenever I have to program some solution to the Schrödinger equation.

Schroedinger is non-relativistic so you can: you're assuming the gamma factor is very close to 1, so the eV mass unit is to be seen as a natural units convention instead of as a full-fledged relativistic approach. Read a booklet on natural units if you need to. If you tried to introduce the gamma factor you'd have to use the Dirac equation to be consistent, but then the rest mass is the one appearing in the Dirac equation.
 
First of all that's indeed a non-relativistic energy-momentum relation, i.e., ##E## should be the kinetic energy of your particle. Then ##p=\sqrt{2mE}## is the magnitude of the particle's momentum and ##k=p/\hbar## is the wave number and ##\lambda=2\pi/k## the de Broglie wavelength. The mass in modern physics is always the invariant mass of the particle. The socalled relativistic mass shouldn't be used anymore anyway, but that's another story.

Further, if written in correct equations, physics is independent of the system of units used (one has to be careful in electrodynamics, where various different systems of units are in use: SI (very unpleasant for theoretical physics but common in experimental physics and because it's the official system of units), Gaussian and Heaviside-Lorentz units, which differ only in the appearance or non-appearance of factors ##4 \pi## in Maxwell's equations).

The usual system of units in high-energy physics is to use MeV or GeV for particle masses (then giving ##E_0=m c^2## of course) and fm for lengths and fm/c for times, where fm=femto metres=fermi=##10^{-15} \; \mathrm{m}##.

It's most convenient to set ##\hbar=c=1## ("natural units"). The only quantity you need to remember then is ##\hbar c \simeq 0.197 \; \mathrm{GeV} \mathrm{fm} = 197 \; \mathrm{MeV} \mathrm{fm}##. In this units it's very simple to work with, because masses, energies and momenta all have the same units. Usually one uses MeV or GeV.

For your example: Say, we look at an electron. It's mass in natural units is ##m=0.511 \; \mathrm{MeV}##. Now let's look at a non-relativistic electron with a kinetic energy ##E=10 \; \mathrm{keV}=10^{-2} \; \mathrm{MeV}##. Then the momentum is
$$p=\sqrt{2 m E}=\sqrt{2\cdot 0.511 \cdot 10^{-2}} \; \mathrm{MeV} \simeq 0.101 \; \mathrm{MeV}.$$
The wavenumber then is given by
$$k=0.101 \mathrm{MeV}/(0.197 \; \mathrm{MeV} \mathrm{fm}) \simeq 0.513/\mathrm{fm}.$$
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Avatrin
Okay, I think I get it. Thank you all for your answers!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
8K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
2K
Replies
60
Views
5K
  • · Replies 45 ·
2
Replies
45
Views
5K
  • · Replies 64 ·
3
Replies
64
Views
11K
  • · Replies 63 ·
3
Replies
63
Views
16K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K