Mass in eV over speed of light

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the use of mass expressed in electronvolts over speed of light squared, particularly in the context of calculations involving energy and momentum in quantum mechanics. Participants explore the implications of using different units and the conditions under which certain equations apply, especially in relation to the Schrödinger equation.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • One participant expresses confusion about whether to multiply or divide mass by the speed of light squared when calculating \(\frac{\sqrt{2mE}}{\hbar}\), given that energy is in electronvolts.
  • Another participant suggests converting all potentials and energies to joules but acknowledges the constraints of an exam setting.
  • A participant discusses the relationship \(E = mc^2\) and how mass can be expressed in eV or MeV, leading to different forms of the equation for momentum.
  • Concerns are raised about the validity of using rest mass for a moving particle, with a participant noting the context of programming solutions to the Schrödinger equation.
  • Another participant clarifies that the energy-momentum relation discussed is non-relativistic and emphasizes the importance of using invariant mass in modern physics.
  • There is mention of natural units where \(\hbar\) and \(c\) are set to 1, simplifying calculations in high-energy physics.
  • A specific example involving an electron's mass and kinetic energy is provided to illustrate the calculations of momentum and wavenumber in natural units.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express varying views on the appropriateness of using rest mass for moving particles and the implications of different unit systems. The discussion does not reach a consensus on the best approach to take in the given context.

Contextual Notes

Participants note the limitations of using non-relativistic equations for moving particles and the potential confusion arising from unit conversions. The discussion highlights the need for careful consideration of the assumptions underlying the equations used.

Who May Find This Useful

This discussion may be useful for students and practitioners in physics, particularly those dealing with quantum mechanics, energy-momentum relations, and unit conversions in theoretical contexts.

Avatrin
Messages
242
Reaction score
6
Hi!
I know the mass of, for instance, an electron can be express in units of electronvolts over speed of light squared. However, I am not sure how to use it. When I have to calculate \frac{\sqrt{2mE}}{\hbar}, do I have to multiply m with the speed of light squared to get it in meters per second squared? Or, divide? Yes, I am a little confused.

PS. Energy is given in electronvolts, and Planck's reduced constant is given in electronvolt seconds.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Okay, but, E is in electronvolts. Also, I have other constants that I need to calculate as well. Would you recommend me to convert all potentials and energies to joules?

Lets say that is not possible. It is exam, and I have to write a code on paper that works (which does happen here).
 
Starting with E = mc2, then m = E/c2, and one can express E in eV, or MeV, and divide it by c2.

So mE leads to (E/c2), or (E/c)2.

Note k = p/ħ

Units should be consistent.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: bhobba
Can I do that? I mean, isn't that only valid if my particle is not moving? My particle is moving. I think the mass I am using is the rest mass, but the energy certainly is not that of a still particle.

I should probably provide some context; I encounter this issue whenever I have to program some solution to the Schrödinger equation.
 
Avatrin said:
Can I do that? I mean, isn't that only valid if my particle is not moving? My particle is moving. I think the mass I am using is the rest mass, but the energy certainly is not that of a still particle.

I should probably provide some context; I encounter this issue whenever I have to program some solution to the Schrödinger equation.

Schroedinger is non-relativistic so you can: you're assuming the gamma factor is very close to 1, so the eV mass unit is to be seen as a natural units convention instead of as a full-fledged relativistic approach. Read a booklet on natural units if you need to. If you tried to introduce the gamma factor you'd have to use the Dirac equation to be consistent, but then the rest mass is the one appearing in the Dirac equation.
 
First of all that's indeed a non-relativistic energy-momentum relation, i.e., ##E## should be the kinetic energy of your particle. Then ##p=\sqrt{2mE}## is the magnitude of the particle's momentum and ##k=p/\hbar## is the wave number and ##\lambda=2\pi/k## the de Broglie wavelength. The mass in modern physics is always the invariant mass of the particle. The socalled relativistic mass shouldn't be used anymore anyway, but that's another story.

Further, if written in correct equations, physics is independent of the system of units used (one has to be careful in electrodynamics, where various different systems of units are in use: SI (very unpleasant for theoretical physics but common in experimental physics and because it's the official system of units), Gaussian and Heaviside-Lorentz units, which differ only in the appearance or non-appearance of factors ##4 \pi## in Maxwell's equations).

The usual system of units in high-energy physics is to use MeV or GeV for particle masses (then giving ##E_0=m c^2## of course) and fm for lengths and fm/c for times, where fm=femto metres=fermi=##10^{-15} \; \mathrm{m}##.

It's most convenient to set ##\hbar=c=1## ("natural units"). The only quantity you need to remember then is ##\hbar c \simeq 0.197 \; \mathrm{GeV} \mathrm{fm} = 197 \; \mathrm{MeV} \mathrm{fm}##. In this units it's very simple to work with, because masses, energies and momenta all have the same units. Usually one uses MeV or GeV.

For your example: Say, we look at an electron. It's mass in natural units is ##m=0.511 \; \mathrm{MeV}##. Now let's look at a non-relativistic electron with a kinetic energy ##E=10 \; \mathrm{keV}=10^{-2} \; \mathrm{MeV}##. Then the momentum is
$$p=\sqrt{2 m E}=\sqrt{2\cdot 0.511 \cdot 10^{-2}} \; \mathrm{MeV} \simeq 0.101 \; \mathrm{MeV}.$$
The wavenumber then is given by
$$k=0.101 \mathrm{MeV}/(0.197 \; \mathrm{MeV} \mathrm{fm}) \simeq 0.513/\mathrm{fm}.$$
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Avatrin
Okay, I think I get it. Thank you all for your answers!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
8K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
2K
Replies
60
Views
5K
  • · Replies 45 ·
2
Replies
45
Views
5K
  • · Replies 64 ·
3
Replies
64
Views
12K
  • · Replies 63 ·
3
Replies
63
Views
16K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
4K