Can two stationary masses repel each other through gravitational forces alone?

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Bob not Alice
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Neutral Repel
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the feasibility of two stationary masses repelling each other solely through gravitational forces. It is established that this can occur if the smaller mass splits into two during the maneuver, utilizing springs or similar mechanical devices. The conversation highlights that without the ability to split the smaller mass, achieving a greater distance between the two masses is not possible. Additionally, the possibility of the smaller mass ending up in a spinning orbit is introduced, emphasizing the importance of understanding the initial and final states in classical physics.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of classical mechanics and gravitational forces
  • Familiarity with mass, distance, and gravitational attraction concepts
  • Knowledge of mechanical devices such as springs
  • Basic principles of orbital motion
NEXT STEPS
  • Explore the concept of gravitational attraction in detail
  • Research the mechanics of mass splitting and its implications
  • Learn about orbital dynamics and how mass can achieve stable orbits
  • Investigate the role of mechanical devices in altering mass interactions
USEFUL FOR

Physics enthusiasts, students studying classical mechanics, and anyone interested in gravitational interactions and orbital dynamics.

Bob not Alice
Messages
6
Reaction score
0
Hi folks,

A system of two masses, stationary with respect two each other, is the starting point. For convenience I'll specify one mass as being much larger than the other. The only force acting between them is their mutual gravitational attraction. At time zero they are an arbitrary distance apart. Some time later they are further apart. Possible or not?

It's actually quite possible. Hint: the smaller mass splits into two during the manoeuvre. Springs, or similar mechanical devices, are allowed.

Just a bit of fun. ;)

Bob.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Bob not Alice said:
Possible or not?
Sure, many possible solutions.
Let them attract each other, at the point where they nearly touch, activate a repulsive spring that splits the smaller mass into two pieces that rapidly move away from each other until they are far away. Find some way to avoid a collision of the spring with the larger mass. Wait. After a while, combine the two parts again.
You trade energy needed by the spring for kinetic energy and/or energy in the gravitational potential.

Alternatively: use a rocket. That is some sort of splitting as well but I guess it is not the intended solution as you lose the mass.

Alternatively: send bullets in a hyperbolic trajectory around the more massive object, catch them again. If you do this with sufficient mass, you get a net repulsion.

Alternatively: directly start splitting the smaller mass, position one half behind the larger mass and close to it, wait a bit, then combine the two smaller masses again. Probably needs some third piece or gyroscopes to avoid a collision.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Bob not Alice
Bob not Alice said:
A system of two masses, stationary with respect two each other, is the starting point. For convenience I'll specify one mass as being much larger than the other. The only force acting between them is their mutual gravitational attraction. At time zero they are an arbitrary distance apart. Some time later they are further apart. Possible or not?

It's actually quite possible. Hint: the smaller mass splits into two during the manoeuvre. Springs, or similar mechanical devices, are allowed.

The wording in your question implies that there are only ever two objects, meaning that they can't be split. Please clarify.
 
Oh, I have a trick solution. How is distance measured? Between their closest points? Between centers of mass? Between geometrical center for balls? For (1) and (3) here is another solution:
Have the center of mass of the larger object close to the point with the largest initial distance to the smaller mass, and have a small hollow tube in the larger mass where the smaller and lighter mass can pass through instead of impacting. Then just wait. The distance between the geometric centers will increase beyond its initial value after a while.
 
Hi mfb,

Good stuff. :oldsmile: The rocket concept isn't really what I was looking for as it involves a permanent mass loss to the system. Neither was the "bounce", hence my stipulation the "the only force acting between them is their mutual gravitational attraction". That was meant in reference to the two initial masses, which I may not have stated explicitly enough.
Your third solution is closest to my own which involved splitting the smaller mass into two equal masses following elliptical orbits.

With the same initial conditions as before I believe it should also be possible to end up with the two masses orbiting each other! Extra hint: The smaller mass has to end up spinning. I'll not say more so that anyone who wants to offer a solution can do so...

Not news for most here, but I think there is something to be taken away from this game. Without knowing you can temporarily split the smaller mass it's not possible to get from the initial state to the final state and if the only two observations one could make were the initial and final states then one would cry "fraud". And this is just in the world of classical physics. :oldlaugh:

Bob.
 
Which bounce? None of my ideas involve the masses touching each other in any way.

I don't see limitations if you allow arbitrary rearrangements of components of the smaller mass.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
19
Views
5K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K