Graduate Massive three particle phase space

Click For Summary
The discussion centers on the production of three massive particles near threshold and the suppression of the cross section by a factor of beta^4, where beta is defined in terms of the total mass and center of mass energy. A participant is struggling to prove this statement due to complications arising from an integral involving the square root of a cubic polynomial. They share the specific integral they are working with, which includes parameters related to the masses of the particles and their momenta. The challenge lies in simplifying this integral to demonstrate the beta^4 dependence. The conversation highlights the complexities of phase space integrals in particle physics.
melli1992
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
If you produce three massive particles with m1=/=m2=/=m3 near threshold (beta -> 0), the cross section of the production is supressed by a factor beta^4, where beta = sqrt(1-(M_tot)^2/s) and s is COM energy. I have been trying to prove this statement, but I can't seem to manage. Could anybody help me?
 
Did you set up the integrals for the phase space factor and then see where an approximation ##M = s(1-\epsilon)## leads? ##\beta^4 = \epsilon^2## here.
 
mfb said:
Did you set up the integrals for the phase space factor and then see where an approximation ##M = s(1-\epsilon)## leads? ##\beta^4 = \epsilon^2## here.
Yes I have, but my problem is that I have an integral over the square root of a polynomial of degree 3. I don't see it reducing to beta^4 that easily...
 
Can you post the integral you get?
 
Yes:
$$\int {\rm d}s_{23} \sqrt{(s^2 + m_1^4+s_{23}^2-2ss_{23}-2m_1^2s_{23}-2sm_1^2)(s_{23}-m_2^2)}$$
We have ##(m_2+m_3)^2 \leq s_{23} \leq s-m_1^2##, ##s=(p_1+p_2+p_3)^2## and ##s_{23} = (p_2 + p_3)^2##. To get to this form, we have assumed that the combined state ##p_{23}## is at rest.
 
If p23 is at rest, then particle 3 is also at rest and s23 is fixed, there would be nothing to integrate over.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
854
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 40 ·
2
Replies
40
Views
5K
  • · Replies 49 ·
2
Replies
49
Views
12K
Replies
11
Views
8K