Massless representations of the Poincare group

Join the discussion
Registration is free. Start your own thread to ask a follow-up.
2 replies · 2K views
Science Advisor
Messages
3,762
Reaction score
297
Never mind, I answered my own question...
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
By definition

[tex]W_0 = \mathbf{P} \cdot \mathbf{J}[/tex]

Applying this operator to [itex]| p \rangle[/itex] we obtain

[tex]W_0 | p \rangle = P_3 J_3 | p \rangle[/tex]

[itex]J_3[/itex] is a generator of the "little group" which leaves this vector invariant (up to a constant factor), so (see eq. (2.5.39) in Weinberg's "The quantum theory of fields")

[tex]W_0 | p \rangle = P_3 \lambda| p \rangle = p_0 \lambda| p \rangle[/tex]

where [itex]\lambda[/itex] is helicity.
 
meopemuk said:
By definition

[tex]W_0 = \mathbf{P} \cdot \mathbf{J}[/tex]

Applying this operator to [itex]| p \rangle[/itex] we obtain

[tex]W_0 | p \rangle = P_3 J_3 | p \rangle[/tex]

[itex]J_3[/itex] is a generator of the "little group" which leaves this vector invariant (up to a constant factor), so (see eq. (2.5.39) in Weinberg's "The quantum theory of fields")

[tex]W_0 | p \rangle = P_3 \lambda| p \rangle = p_0 \lambda| p \rangle[/tex]

where [itex]\lambda[/itex] is helicity.
Thank you. My problem was in convincing myself that J_3 leaves the state invariant. I will look at Weinberg when I can

Thanks again