Mastering Algebra for Physics for College Students

  • Thread starter Thread starter Flustered
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Physics
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the mathematical requirements for studying physics, particularly in relation to college algebra and its application in physics courses like Physics 234 and astrophysics. Participants express their concerns and experiences regarding the level of algebra and other mathematical skills needed for success in these fields.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Debate/contested
  • Homework-related
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • One participant expresses anxiety about using the quadratic formula and questions how much algebra is needed for physics courses.
  • Another participant emphasizes the necessity of a solid foundation in algebra for success in physics, suggesting that disliking algebra could lead to difficulties.
  • Concerns are raised about the variability of course numbering and prerequisites across different universities.
  • A participant inquires about the mathematical demands of astrophysics, expressing surprise at the level of math required.
  • Some participants argue that a strong grasp of algebra is essential, with one stating that mastering algebra is crucial for understanding physics concepts.
  • Another participant suggests that the perception of math as difficult may stem from poor teaching methods and emphasizes the beauty of mathematics once foundational concepts are understood.
  • There are discussions about the relevance of the quadratic formula in various physics contexts, including classical mechanics and planetary motion.
  • One participant mentions the importance of various mathematical techniques learned in lower division math courses, asserting their usefulness in physics and other scientific fields.
  • References to external resources, such as Mary Boas's "Mathematical Methods in the Physical Sciences," are made to guide participants on necessary mathematical skills.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally agree that a strong foundation in algebra is important for studying physics, but there are differing opinions on the extent of mathematical requirements and the perceived difficulty of math. The discussion remains unresolved regarding specific expectations for different physics courses and the role of algebra in various physics applications.

Contextual Notes

Participants highlight the variability in course prerequisites and the subjective nature of math difficulty, indicating that experiences may differ based on individual backgrounds and teaching quality.

Flustered
Messages
75
Reaction score
0
Hello I had a couple set backs in high school none the less. I am a freshman in college now and taking college algebra, and I hate using the quadratic formula to figure things out. I know physics has a lot of trigonometry and calculus. How much algebra should I be expecting in my travel to physics 234 and what not?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
None of us have any idea what university you attend, thus none of us have any idea what physics 234 is. I suspect it's the introductory algebra based physics courses, though. If you can't (or is it that you just dislike it) use the quadratic formula, you are going to have problems. Physics requires a solid foundation in algebra.
 
Flustered said:
Hello I had a couple set backs in high school none the less. I am a freshman in college now and taking college algebra, and I hate using the quadratic formula to figure things out. I know physics has a lot of trigonometry and calculus. How much algebra should I be expecting in my travel to physics 234 and what not?

There's a section of the forum for the topic of academic guidance. You might get better advice if you have your post moved there. And do you expect people to know what course physics 234 is? Course numberings aren't standardized from college to college - at least in the USA. Doesn't your college publish the prerequisites for the courses?
 
I guess my question really is, how much math is involved in AstroPhysics and how much solar systems, formation of the moon etc.. I decided to major in AstroPhysics because I watch all of the "how the universe works" and I want to learn about how the galaxies were formed, where particles came from. I didn't know that you need to be a mathematician to understand all of this.
 
Well so tough luck
You scare algebra?!So don't even look at physics.
Because I can give you a list with 3 pages that says what mathematics do you need for physics.
And YES!You should be a mathematician to understand physics,sometimes even more!
 
Don't be scared of maths - the main reasons people dislike it, in my opinion, is that it is

A) Teached badly in schools and
B) The maths they teach you in schools, in general, is extremely boring, making it harder to study.

If you are serious about doing physics, you should be serious about getting good at maths. And don't worry, even if you don't think you enjoy maths (or are good at it), you will start to enjoy it (and get better at it) after you've got past the tedious details which get you started and can begin seeing the beauty of maths.
 
I like math I think math is easy, the hard part is just remember the formulas to solve a problem.
 
I'm not an astrophysicist, but you can get by with different levels of math, depending on what kind of astrophysicist you want to be. I have heard about applications of PhD level math to astrophysics, but that isn't necessary. However, the minimum math level would be very high, by your standards. Calculus (including vector calculus), linear algebra, ordinary differential equations, differential geometry, partial differential equations, calculus of variations.

I like math I think math is easy, the hard part is just remember the formulas to solve a problem.

Math isn't really about using formulas to solve a problem. Formulas, when they come up, often have a physical or geometric meaning and that's how to remember a lot of them. Or you remember how to derive the formula.

I think you need to read Lockheart's lament to see what you've been missing:

http://www.maa.org/devlin/devlin_03_08.html
 
Last edited by a moderator:
If you want to do physics, then your algebra will have to be excellent. You'll have to be able to solve quadratic formula's with ease. If you find algebra hard, then you need to practice even more before starting physics.
 
  • #10
Im just having a hard time seeing where the quadratic formula is going to come in hand, when I'm studying how planets move or expansion of space. (examples)
 
  • #11
You want examples of problems in rigid body motion that use algebra? In relativity? Quantum mechanics? You can take it from the physicists here that you need to master algebra (and an awful lot more) to do well in physics. Study hard, ask questions, and practice. The math and physics you use will get more challenging and much more interesting as you move through the physics curriculum.
 
  • #12
Flustered said:
Im just having a hard time seeing where the quadratic formula is going to come in hand, when I'm studying how planets move or expansion of space. (examples)

Quadratic equations come up frequently in classical mechanics, which includes how planets move. One example would be a solution to a differential equation based on F=ma, which is really just F=m*d^2r/dr^2 - a second-order differential equation.

Maybe you're wanting to analyze planetary accretion in a newly formed gaseous nebula. You might be interested in how a large body would travel in such a medium. You might formulate a second-order differential equation that assumes a central force (a central star, for instance), a 'drag' force proportional to the velocity of the planet and tangent to the elliptical orbit, and a non-uniform gas medium. Thus, your differential equation would be dependent on the second derivative of your position (acceleration), the first derivative of your position (velocity), and your position itself. The resulting differential equation can be solved using a quadratic equation and a couple assumptions that turn out to be true.

And that's just something I can think of off the top of my head.
 
  • #13
Flustered said:
I guess my question really is, how much math is involved in AstroPhysics and how much solar systems, formation of the moon etc.. I decided to major in AstroPhysics because I watch all of the "how the universe works" and I want to learn about how the galaxies were formed, where particles came from. I didn't know that you need to be a mathematician to understand all of this.

I strongly suggest you look up texts such as Mary Boas's "Mathematical Methods in the Physical Sciences". That should give you a very good idea on the type and level of mathematics you will need.

Zz.
 
  • #14
Flustered said:
Im just having a hard time seeing where the quadratic formula is going to come in hand, when I'm studying how planets move or expansion of space. (examples)
I use the quadratic formula all the time from pure math classes such as deriving an expression for inverse sine or to physical chemistry for finding the amount of gas in a container at equilibrium to physics!

Truth is, despite if you can see it or not at this point, ALL the math you learn until you are done with lower division math completely is useful.

Partial fractions, all your factoring techniques, all of it.
 
  • #15
homeomorphic said:
I think you need to read Lockheart's lament to see what you've been missing:

http://www.maa.org/devlin/devlin_03_08.html

Wow, incredible read. That makes me want to get into teaching to try to save some tortured souls.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #16
Thanks for all the replies.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
13
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
5K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
7K