Mastering Epsilon-Delta Proofs: How to Find Delta When x Approaches a Value 'a'?

  • Thread starter Thread starter phos
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Proof
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

This discussion focuses on mastering epsilon-delta proofs, specifically how to find delta when x approaches a value 'a'. The user describes their approach using the function f(x) = 1/x and demonstrates the process of manipulating the expression to isolate delta. Key steps include expressing x as a + h, ensuring that h remains within specific bounds to maintain the limit's validity, and solving for h in relation to epsilon. The conversation emphasizes the importance of understanding the foundational concepts of limits and suggests resources like "Thomas and Finney" for further learning.

PREREQUISITES
  • Epsilon-delta definitions of limits
  • Basic algebraic manipulation of fractions
  • Understanding of continuity and limits in calculus
  • Familiarity with functions and their behavior near specific points
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the epsilon-delta definition of limits in detail
  • Practice problems from "Thomas and Finney" on epsilon-delta proofs
  • Explore the concept of continuity and its implications for limits
  • Learn about the behavior of rational functions near their asymptotes
USEFUL FOR

Students learning calculus, particularly those struggling with epsilon-delta proofs, educators seeking to clarify teaching methods, and anyone interested in deepening their understanding of limits in mathematical analysis.

phos
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Hello,

I have been looking around the net recently trying to teach myself how to do delta/epsilon proofs. unfortunately, my prof sucks :frown: . Anyway, I think I understand how to get delta in terms of epsilon for limits where x approaches a number, but I'm having difficulty finding what to do when x approaches a value 'a'.

eg. prove: lim of x approaches a ( 1/x^3) = (1/a^3)


I don't really need a solution, although it would be welcome. I'm just interested in what the usual procedure is for finding delta as I'm always stuck with an 'a' term and an 'x' term that I'm not sure what to do with or how to get rid of. Any help is greatly appreciated.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
i usually write x as a+h, whgere h is basically delta, and then subtract f(x) from f(a) to see how big it is. then i try to make it elss than epsilon.

for example if i have f(x) = 1/x, i call it 1/(a+h) and look at 1/(a+h) - 1/a.

assume a >0.

that equals (a - [a+h])/[a(a+h)] = -h/[a(a+h)]. now i want this to be small, so i want the bottom to be large, and i need to get a handle on h. If h were too close to -a the bottom would get too small so I choose h first of all to be less than a/2. Then a+h is between a/2 and 3a/2. so the bottom is between a^2/2 and 3a^2/2.

remember i want the bottom to be large, so i know the bottom is at least as large as a^2/2, whenever h is less than a/2.

now that emans the fraction h/[a(a+h)], is at least as small as h/[a^2/2] = 2h/a^2.

so if i can also make 2h/a^2 less than epsilon i am home. well that is easy to solve for.

i need h less than a^2/2 times epsilon, and also less than a/2.

i hated these fraction ones as a young student because you have to just play around with them likwe this, but see if you can check this out and then if it works, generalize it to your case.
 
Saying your prof sucks isn't going to get any sympathy since most of the people here who answer questions are teachers who probablyu doubt your ability to make an unbiased judgement about someone trying to teach you a difficult subject that you don't yet understand.

As for this question, or many analysis questions, finding the exact eps-delta stuff is completely unnecessary: you know x tends to a as, erm, x tends to a, and that if x and y tend to a and b resp that xy tends to ab, and that if a is not zero 1/x tends to 1/a, hence result.
 
Do you have Thomas and Finney? It has a nice introduction to epsilon-delta and the formal definition of limit. You should be able to get a good deal of practice from that book as well.

Cheers
Vivek
 
Relativistic Momentum, Mass, and Energy Momentum and mass (...), the classic equations for conserving momentum and energy are not adequate for the analysis of high-speed collisions. (...) The momentum of a particle moving with velocity ##v## is given by $$p=\cfrac{mv}{\sqrt{1-(v^2/c^2)}}\qquad{R-10}$$ ENERGY In relativistic mechanics, as in classic mechanics, the net force on a particle is equal to the time rate of change of the momentum of the particle. Considering one-dimensional...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
6K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
12K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K