jazzyfizzle
- 9
- 0
1. A
Last edited:
The discussion revolves around a dynamics problem involving motion under varying forces, specifically focusing on calculating distance and velocity over two segments of motion. Participants are exploring kinematic equations and the implications of force and acceleration in their calculations.
Some participants have provided hints and guidance on how to approach the problem step by step, while others express uncertainty about their calculations and seek clarification on the application of kinematic principles. There is an ongoing exploration of different interpretations of the problem setup.
Participants note the absence of numerical values for force and the need to express results in terms of variables. There are discussions about the definitions of acceleration and the correct application of time intervals for each segment of motion.
Since you don't have numbers, you'll express your answer in terms of the given data--F0, t0, and m.jazzyfizzle said:But that's the thing.. I don't know the force. How are you supposed to even do this when there's no numbers involved ?
You're on the right track. Hint: Treat each segment of the motion separately. In the first segment (from t = 0 to t0), the initial speed is zero--but that's not the case for the second half of the motion.I just tried it and got :
x=2[(1/2)(F0/m)t^2]
There's a much easier way to find the final velocity of the first segment. What's the definition of acceleration?jazzyfizzle said:Should I maybe use vf^2=vi^2+2ax to find the final velocity of the first segment?
then go from there ?
No, it's not.jazzyfizzle said:For a final answer I got
x=((2F0*t0^2)/m)) + (4F0t0)/m
But... I don't think that's right at all...
Good! You have the first segment done.jazzyfizzle said:Ok what I did was :
First I used x=v0t+1/2at^2 to find the distance traveled for the first segment before the force doubled
I plugged in a=(F/m) for the acceleration and v0=0 for the initial velocity
Then i got
x=1/2(F0/m)t^2
for the first segment
Good. An easier way would be to use vf = vi + at, but your way is perfectly fine.Then,
i used vf^2=vi^2+2ax to find the final velocity of the first segment
(plugging in the x i found from above and a=F/m and v0=0)
which i got to be
vf= (F0t)/m
That will give you the distance for the second segment. (Then you'll add that to what you already found for the first segment.)then I used that final velocity as the initial velocity for the 2nd segment
and plugged in a=2F0/m
into x=v0t+1/2at^2
I don't see how you got this. Show me what you plugged in where.and somehow came out with the answer
x=((2F0*t0^2)/m)) + (4F0t0)/m
That's not dimensionally correct. Show me what you plugged in for each term in the following:jazzyfizzle said:For the second segment I'm getting the distance as
[F0(3t0 + t0^2)]/m
v0 and a are correct, but the time for the second segment is the same as the first: t0. (From t0 to 2t0.)jazzyfizzle said:v0 ---> (F0t0)/m
t ----> 2
a -----> (2F0)/m