Mastering Logarithms: Simplifying Logarithmic Expressions

  • Thread starter Thread starter theintarnets
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Logarithm
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around simplifying logarithmic expressions, specifically evaluating the expression (log34 + log29)² - (log34 - log29)² without a calculator. Participants are exploring properties of logarithms and algebraic identities related to logarithmic functions.

Discussion Character

  • Mixed

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants attempt to manipulate the expression using algebraic identities, such as the difference of squares. Some express confusion over the transition between operations, while others suggest factoring or changing the base of logarithms as potential strategies.

Discussion Status

There is an ongoing exploration of different methods to simplify the expression. Some participants have provided guidance on using specific algebraic identities, while others are still grappling with the problem and seeking further assistance. Multiple interpretations of the problem are being discussed, and there is no explicit consensus on the best approach yet.

Contextual Notes

Participants are working under the constraints of a homework assignment, which may limit the tools or methods they feel comfortable using. There is also mention of a specific expected outcome (16), which adds pressure to their attempts at simplification.

theintarnets
Messages
64
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Evaluate without a calculator:
(log34 + log29)2 - (log34 - log29)2

Homework Equations


The Attempt at a Solution


(log34 + log29)2 - (log34 - log29)2

(2log32 + 2log23)2 - (2log32 - 2log23)2

And now I'm stuck...
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
theintarnets said:

The Attempt at a Solution


(log34 + log29)2 / (log34 - log29)2

(2log34 + 2log29) / (2log34 - 2log29)

And now I'm stuck...

You went from a minus to a divide, I think you confused it with log(a/b)= loga-logb

Try using this fact a2-b2 = (a+b)(a-b).
 
a^2-b^2=(a-b)(a+b)EDIT: how to delete message
 
theintarnets said:
(log34 + log29)2 / (log34 - log29)2

(2log34 + 2log29) / (2log34 - 2log29)
It also looks like you went from
(log34 + log29)2
to
(log342 + log292),
which is not true.
 
Ohhhhh, I see. I shall re-attempt now. Thanks.
 
Hmmm. I think it's simpler than that, guys -
Setting A = log34 and B = log29

(A+B)2 - (A-B)2 = (A2 + 2AB + B2) - (A2 - 2AB + B2)

...

and later on using that lognxk = k.lognx
and that logab \times logbc = logac
 
Erm...Nevermind. I'm still stuck. Can someone walk me through it please?

Edit: I totally forgot about factoring. I'll try that, thanks!
 
try this (A+B)^2 - (A-B)^2 = X^2 - Y^2 = ( X + Y ) ( X - Y )

where X=(A+B) and Y=(A-B)

and you get (A+B)^2 - (A-B)^2 =(2A) (2B) = 4AB
 
Okay one of my friends just told me to try changing the base. I did that, and now I have a giant mess on my hands. I have

(ln2*ln4 + ln3*ln9 / ln3*ln2)^2 - (ln2*ln4 - ln3*ln9 / ln3*ln2)^2 and somehow I'm supposed to get 16 from all of that. I'm not really sure how...
 
  • #10
theintarnets said:
Okay one of my friends just told me to try changing the base. I did that, and now I have a giant mess on my hands. I have

(ln2*ln4 + ln3*ln9 / ln3*ln2)^2 - (ln2*ln4 - ln3*ln9 / ln3*ln2)^2 and somehow I'm supposed to get 16 from all of that. I'm not really sure how...

No, no, NO! Don't change the base at the beginning. Do what Joffan suggested. You can change the base much later if you really want to.
 
  • #11
Okie. Trying again now.

Edit: I just can't seem to do it no matter what I try :(
 
Last edited:
  • #12
Show us what you have so far.
 
  • #13
Well I tried applying this:
Setting A = log34 and B = log29
(A+B)2 - (A-B)2 = (A2 + 2AB + B2) - (A2 - 2AB + B2)
The A2's and B2's will cancel out leaving me with 4AB which would be

4(log34 * log29)

The answer in the book says I'm supposed to get 16. I tried changing the base to get
4(ln4*ln9 / ln3*ln2)
I think I could maybe do 4(2ln2*2ln3 / ln3*ln2) but I'm not sure if that's correct. I think then maybe the ln2's and ln3's would cancel out leaving me with 4(2*2) which would be 16. But I'm not sure if that's correct.
 
  • #14
theintarnets said:
Well I tried applying this:
Setting A = log34 and B = log29
(A+B)2 - (A-B)2 = (A2 + 2AB + B2) - (A2 - 2AB + B2)
The A2's and B2's will cancel out leaving me with 4AB which would be

4(log34 * log29)

The answer in the book says I'm supposed to get 16. I tried changing the base to get
4(ln4*ln9 / ln3*ln2)
I think I could maybe do 4(2ln2*2ln3 / ln3*ln2) but I'm not sure if that's correct. I think then maybe the ln2's and ln3's would cancel out leaving me with 4(2*2) which would be 16. But I'm not sure if that's correct.
That's correct.
 
  • #15
Yay! Thanks so much everyone!
 
  • #16
Also, if you didn't want to change base,
<br /> \begin{align}<br /> log_34 \times log_29 &amp; = log_32^2 \times log_23^2\\<br /> &amp;= 2log_32 \times 2log_23\\<br /> &amp;= 4(log_32.log_23)\\<br /> &amp;= 4(log_33) \\<br /> &amp;=4<br /> \end{align}<br />
 

Similar threads

Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
3K
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K