Masters degree letter of motivation feedback.

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around feedback on a motivation letter for a Master's program at the University of Regensburg. Participants evaluate the structure, clarity, and content of the letter, focusing on how to effectively present academic experiences and aspirations.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested
  • Conceptual clarification

Main Points Raised

  • One participant expresses confidence in their background and experiences, emphasizing self-study and project work in algorithmics, programming, and computational physics.
  • Another participant critiques the letter's structure, suggesting it should include an introduction, body, and conclusion, along with a salutation and signature block.
  • A different participant notes the need for adjustments in language usage and clarity, indicating that while the ideas are good, they lack specificity.
  • There is a response questioning the clarity and specificity of the experiences shared, asking for examples of what could be clearer.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants do not appear to reach consensus on the effectiveness of the letter's structure or clarity, with differing opinions on what constitutes a well-structured motivation letter.

Contextual Notes

Some participants note the omission of personal information in the letter, which may affect the overall presentation. There is also a mention of the need for clearer examples to support the claims made in the letter.

Who May Find This Useful

Individuals seeking feedback on academic motivation letters, particularly for graduate programs in STEM fields, may find this discussion relevant.

zivo
Messages
7
Reaction score
2
This is my motivation letter for the university of Regensburg (Masters). The bad thing is that my grades are above average, not great. And I have little to no research experience due to my BSc school. I avoided useless mumbo-jumbo and flatter so it's going to be short and to the point. I pushed the stengths which were strongly mentioned in my recommendation letters. Feedback greatly appreciated.

I am confident that my background will be a valuable addition to your graduate program. Throughout my second year, I taught myself algorithmics and programming and completed my first major project that allowed my to solve a wide variety of problems encountered in my waves and quanta course. In addition, I also got intrigued by solid state physics and started learning it through Ashcroft and Mermin's excellent book. During my final year, I learned computational physics on the side, and used to to complete my second major project, a group project for simulating ideal gases using the HPP model in a high performance implementation and presented it in a poster session. I believe this experience has taught me about working in groups and self-study, and prepared me for the academic challenges that lie ahead.

After attaining my Masters degree, I plan on pursuing a Ph.D in condensed matter. Particularly in emergent phenomena, a field which I grew to like during my Bachelor degree.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I don't think this is a good structure for a letter.

You need at least 3 paragraphs : intro, body and conclusion with a salutation and signature block.
 
A few adjustments to language USAGE but that itself will not be enough.

zivo said:
I am confident that my background will be a valuable addition to your graduate program.
A reasonable main sentence or main idea sentence for the paragraph.

Then came the discussion of the main idea:
Throughout my second year, I taught myself algorithmics and programming and completed my first major project that allowed my to solve a wide variety of problems encountered in my waves and quanta course. In addition, I also got intrigued by solid state physics and started learning it through Ashcroft and Mermin's excellent book. During my final year, I learned computational physics on the side, and used to to complete my second major project, a group project for simulating ideal gases using the HPP model in a high performance implementation and presented it in a poster session. I believe this experience has taught me about working in groups and self-study, and prepared me for the academic challenges that lie ahead.
Nice ideas but NOT CLEAR OR SPECIFIC ENOUGH.
 
CivilSigma said:
I don't think this is a good structure for a letter.

You need at least 3 paragraphs : intro, body and conclusion with a salutation and signature block.

I deliberate left out the intro, salutation and signature block due to personal info.
symbolipoint said:
Nice ideas but NOT CLEAR OR SPECIFIC ENOUGH.

I thought that was clear, I was giving practical, specific experiences. Instead of willy-nilly. What do you mean by clear and specific, do you have an example?
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: CivilSigma and member 587159

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 50 ·
2
Replies
50
Views
11K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
818
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K