MHB Material Implication: True Premise, False Result

Click For Summary
The discussion centers on the concept of material implication in logic, specifically addressing how an implication with a false premise can still be considered true. Participants highlight the nuances of logical reasoning and the significance of understanding premises in arguments. The conversation emphasizes the importance of clarity in distinguishing between true premises and their outcomes. Additionally, the post serves as a reference point for future inquiries into this logical principle. Overall, the insights shared contribute to a deeper understanding of material implication in philosophical discourse.
Evgeny.Makarov
Gold Member
MHB
Messages
2,434
Reaction score
4
aAYMb90_460s_v1.jpg


I'll be linking to this post when the question arises why an implication with a false premise is true.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
That was brilliant, EM! :)
 

Similar threads

B Vacuously true statements and why false implies truth
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
6K
I Syntactic vs semantic logical consequence (entailment)
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
I Why are the inverse and converse of an implication not equivalent?
  • · Replies 39 ·
2
Replies
39
Views
4K
MHB True or False Integral Calculus Question #2
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
MHB True or False Integral Calculus Question #1
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
3K
MHB True or False Integral Calculus Question #3
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
MHB Level curves: true / false question
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
I Is Vacuum Decay from a False to True State Impossible or Just Unlikely?
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
MHB Topology Munkres Chapter 1 exercise 2 b and c- Set theory equivalent statements
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Godel's incompleteness; result of implication?
  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
6K