Math for Blending Numbers: Find "X

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter fifthFunction
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Numbers
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

This discussion focuses on blending two numbers, A=1 and B=9, using an inverse square method rather than a linear approach. The user seeks to determine values at specific points, such as 0.5 and 0.85, and explores functions like f(x)=(2x+1)² and g(x)=(x+3.5)²-11.25 to achieve this. The conversation highlights the necessity of additional information, such as the light source's emission characteristics, for accurate calculations. Ultimately, the user finds that using a linear blend with a power function, pow(mix(A,B,P),2), yields satisfactory results for their application.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of inverse square law in physics
  • Familiarity with quadratic functions and parabolas
  • Knowledge of blending techniques in mathematical functions
  • Basic concepts of light intensity and emission characteristics
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the inverse square law and its applications in light intensity
  • Learn how to derive quadratic equations from given points
  • Explore advanced blending techniques in mathematical modeling
  • Study the effects of light emission angles on intensity calculations
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, physicists, graphic designers, and anyone involved in modeling light intensity and blending numerical values in non-linear ways.

fifthFunction
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
TL;DR
blend 2 numbers by inverse square
i have not clue if this is the right place to ask
if i had 2 numbers and i wanted to blend between them but instead of a linear way it was in an inverse square way.. how would that math go?
so if i had A=1 and B=9 and wanted the number at 0.5 it would be 4.. or if i wanted the number at 0.85 it would be "X"
 
Physics news on Phys.org
It depends on what exactly you need. For a parabola you need three points (or some other additional information), with just two points it is ambiguous.

As an example, f(x)=(2x+1)2 satisfies f(0)=1 and f(1)=9 and it matches f(0.5)=4, but g(x)=(x+3.5)2-11.25 fits your two borders as well, it would give g(0.5)=4.75.

Anyway: If you want a parabola, find the equation for the parabola you want, then plug in different numbers.
 
i think the most simple way to explain what i am trying to do is to map a section of a gradient of the falloff of light?
so say you have a strip of paper with a light at one end and you measure how bright one side is and how bright the other side is.. you input that into the function and it would tell you how bright the middle of the paper is
 
That depends on where your light source is and how its emission looks like. For a uniform emission you get an inverse square law for the intensity, modified with the incidence angle if not orthogonal. Just knowing the intensity at both sides is not sufficient.
 
ok so it seems if i do something like A=sqrt(1),B=sqrt(9),P=0.5 then just feed that into a linear blend pow(mix(A,B,P),2) it works.. don't know if its the best way tho
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
1K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
438
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
949
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
964