I Math Myth: You cannot divide by 0

  • I
  • Thread starter Thread starter Greg Bernhardt
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the concept of dividing by zero, emphasizing that it is not defined in mathematics due to the lack of a meaningful result. Division implies separating into specific-sized groups, which is impossible with zero. The conversation explores the relationship between zero and infinity, clarifying that while zero is a number, division by zero leads to undefined outcomes. It also highlights that attempting to define 0/0 yields no practical value, as it does not correspond to any usable number. Ultimately, the inability to divide by zero underscores fundamental principles in mathematics.
Messages
19,793
Reaction score
10,749
From @fresh_42's Insight
https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/10-math-things-we-all-learnt-wrong-at-school/

Please discuss!

This always sounded to me as if there was obscure mathematics police that forbids us to do so. Why? Well, there is actually a simple reason: ##0## hasn't the least to do with multiplication and even less with division. The question to divide by ##0## doesn't even arise! The neutral element for multiplication is ##1,## not ##0##. That belongs to addition. And there is only one way to combine the two, namely by the distributive law ##a\cdot(b+c)=a\cdot b+b\cdot c.## Let's pretend there was a meaningful way to define ##m=a:0.## Then $$a=m\cdot 0 = m\cdot (1-1)= m\cdot 1 - m\cdot 1= m-m =0$$ So can we at least divide ##a=0## by ##0## and get ##m##? I'm afraid not. Have a look at $$m\cdot a= \dfrac{0}{0}\cdot a = \dfrac{0\cdot a}{0\cdot 1}=\dfrac{0}{0}=m\Longrightarrow a=1$$ or $$2m=(1+1)\cdot m=m+m=\dfrac{0}{0}+\dfrac{0}{0}=\dfrac{0+0}{0}=\dfrac{0}{0}=m$$ and we could only multiply ##m## by ##1##. So even if we define ##m=0/0## we wouldn't get anything useful in the sense that it would be connected to any number we normally use for calculations.
 
Last edited:
Mathematics news on Phys.org
The normal statement is "division by zero is not defined".
It's not so much that you "cannot" do it. You can logically deduce that the value you seek is 0/0. But when you do, you probably want to try again, since 0/0 is most commonly of no practical use.
 
What is the maximum number of people you can feed? Since you're not really feeding them something, there's no cap. If all seven billion people on the planet turn up at your door and demand their share of pizza, you should say "No problem!" because "their share of pizza" is meaningless. You might say the same thing if you added another seven billion people. What is the maximum number of people you can feed? There’s no answer.

There is no single answer when dividing a number by 0. To divide anything means to separate it into piles of a specific size. It doesn't make sense to break anything down into size zero piles.
 
emmawarner96 said:
What is the maximum number of people you can feed? Since you're not really feeding them something, there's no cap. If all seven billion people on the planet turn up at your door and demand their share of pizza, you should say "No problem!" because "their share of pizza" is meaningless. You might say the same thing if you added another seven billion people. What is the maximum number of people you can feed? There’s no answer.
What you are describing is not division by zero. Here, you are dividing some finite number (1 pizza) by a relatively large number, not zero. In the first case, each person would get ##\frac 1{7,000,000,000}##th of the pizza. In the second case, each person would get a slice that was half as large.

Actually, there is at least a theoretical limit to how small the shares could be, since the pizza contains some large number of pizza "molecules." Once we get down to shares that are only a single "molecule" (I realize that there is no such thing as a pizza molecule, but you probably get the idea), then we can't divide the pizza any further with each person getting a piece of the pizza.

If "pizza molecule" bothers you, just take it a bit further down to the atomic level.
 
Mark44 said:
What you are describing is not division by zero. Here, you are dividing some finite number (1 pizza) by a relatively large number, not zero. In the first case, each person would get ##\frac 1{7,000,000,000}##th of the pizza. In the second case, each person would get a slice that was half as large.

Actually, there is at least a theoretical limit to how small the shares could be, since the pizza contains some large number of pizza "molecules." Once we get down to shares that are only a single "molecule" (I realize that there is no such thing as a pizza molecule, but you probably get the idea), then we can't divide the pizza any further with each person getting a piece of the pizza.

If "pizza molecule" bothers you, just take it a bit further down to the atomic level.
If we cannot divide by zero then is it not considered a number?

A number on the number line -2, -1, 0, 1, 2?

The number between -1 and 1?

Dividing a number by -1 has a value also 1 and also 0.1, 0.01, 0.001 etc ie approaching infinity so what is happening between the area where everything is undefined before it appears on the negative side?
With something mysterious in between?

Ie is this an infinity is a concept not a number issue? Are Zero and infinity somehow inextricably linked?

None mathematician view of the question
 
pinball1970 said:
If we cannot divide by zero then is it not considered a number?

A number on the number line -2, -1, 0, 1, 2?

The number between -1 and 1?
Zero is a number. The fact that division by zero is not defined has no bearing on whether it is a number.
pinball1970 said:
Dividing a number by -1 has a value also 1 and also 0.1, 0.01, 0.001 etc ie approaching infinity so what is happening between the area where everything is undefined before it appears on the negative side?
With something mysterious in between?
Not sure what you're asking here. You can divide any real number by any other real number except zero. The divisor can be as small as you like, just as long as it is not zero.
pinball1970 said:
Ie is this an infinity is a concept not a number issue? Are Zero and infinity somehow inextricably linked?
Yes, infinity is a concept unless you're talking about the extended real numbers.
 
  • Informative
Likes pinball1970
Seemingly by some mathematical coincidence, a hexagon of sides 2,2,7,7, 11, and 11 can be inscribed in a circle of radius 7. The other day I saw a math problem on line, which they said came from a Polish Olympiad, where you compute the length x of the 3rd side which is the same as the radius, so that the sides of length 2,x, and 11 are inscribed on the arc of a semi-circle. The law of cosines applied twice gives the answer for x of exactly 7, but the arithmetic is so complex that the...
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...

Similar threads

Replies
14
Views
2K
Replies
142
Views
9K
Replies
4
Views
1K
Replies
17
Views
2K
2
Replies
61
Views
9K
Back
Top