I Math Myth: You cannot divide by 0

  • I
  • Thread starter Thread starter Greg Bernhardt
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the concept of dividing by zero, emphasizing that it is not defined in mathematics due to the lack of a meaningful result. Division implies separating into specific-sized groups, which is impossible with zero. The conversation explores the relationship between zero and infinity, clarifying that while zero is a number, division by zero leads to undefined outcomes. It also highlights that attempting to define 0/0 yields no practical value, as it does not correspond to any usable number. Ultimately, the inability to divide by zero underscores fundamental principles in mathematics.
Messages
19,781
Reaction score
10,734
From @fresh_42's Insight
https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/10-math-things-we-all-learnt-wrong-at-school/

Please discuss!

This always sounded to me as if there was obscure mathematics police that forbids us to do so. Why? Well, there is actually a simple reason: ##0## hasn't the least to do with multiplication and even less with division. The question to divide by ##0## doesn't even arise! The neutral element for multiplication is ##1,## not ##0##. That belongs to addition. And there is only one way to combine the two, namely by the distributive law ##a\cdot(b+c)=a\cdot b+b\cdot c.## Let's pretend there was a meaningful way to define ##m=a:0.## Then $$a=m\cdot 0 = m\cdot (1-1)= m\cdot 1 - m\cdot 1= m-m =0$$ So can we at least divide ##a=0## by ##0## and get ##m##? I'm afraid not. Have a look at $$m\cdot a= \dfrac{0}{0}\cdot a = \dfrac{0\cdot a}{0\cdot 1}=\dfrac{0}{0}=m\Longrightarrow a=1$$ or $$2m=(1+1)\cdot m=m+m=\dfrac{0}{0}+\dfrac{0}{0}=\dfrac{0+0}{0}=\dfrac{0}{0}=m$$ and we could only multiply ##m## by ##1##. So even if we define ##m=0/0## we wouldn't get anything useful in the sense that it would be connected to any number we normally use for calculations.
 
Last edited:
Mathematics news on Phys.org
The normal statement is "division by zero is not defined".
It's not so much that you "cannot" do it. You can logically deduce that the value you seek is 0/0. But when you do, you probably want to try again, since 0/0 is most commonly of no practical use.
 
What is the maximum number of people you can feed? Since you're not really feeding them something, there's no cap. If all seven billion people on the planet turn up at your door and demand their share of pizza, you should say "No problem!" because "their share of pizza" is meaningless. You might say the same thing if you added another seven billion people. What is the maximum number of people you can feed? There’s no answer.

There is no single answer when dividing a number by 0. To divide anything means to separate it into piles of a specific size. It doesn't make sense to break anything down into size zero piles.
 
emmawarner96 said:
What is the maximum number of people you can feed? Since you're not really feeding them something, there's no cap. If all seven billion people on the planet turn up at your door and demand their share of pizza, you should say "No problem!" because "their share of pizza" is meaningless. You might say the same thing if you added another seven billion people. What is the maximum number of people you can feed? There’s no answer.
What you are describing is not division by zero. Here, you are dividing some finite number (1 pizza) by a relatively large number, not zero. In the first case, each person would get ##\frac 1{7,000,000,000}##th of the pizza. In the second case, each person would get a slice that was half as large.

Actually, there is at least a theoretical limit to how small the shares could be, since the pizza contains some large number of pizza "molecules." Once we get down to shares that are only a single "molecule" (I realize that there is no such thing as a pizza molecule, but you probably get the idea), then we can't divide the pizza any further with each person getting a piece of the pizza.

If "pizza molecule" bothers you, just take it a bit further down to the atomic level.
 
Mark44 said:
What you are describing is not division by zero. Here, you are dividing some finite number (1 pizza) by a relatively large number, not zero. In the first case, each person would get ##\frac 1{7,000,000,000}##th of the pizza. In the second case, each person would get a slice that was half as large.

Actually, there is at least a theoretical limit to how small the shares could be, since the pizza contains some large number of pizza "molecules." Once we get down to shares that are only a single "molecule" (I realize that there is no such thing as a pizza molecule, but you probably get the idea), then we can't divide the pizza any further with each person getting a piece of the pizza.

If "pizza molecule" bothers you, just take it a bit further down to the atomic level.
If we cannot divide by zero then is it not considered a number?

A number on the number line -2, -1, 0, 1, 2?

The number between -1 and 1?

Dividing a number by -1 has a value also 1 and also 0.1, 0.01, 0.001 etc ie approaching infinity so what is happening between the area where everything is undefined before it appears on the negative side?
With something mysterious in between?

Ie is this an infinity is a concept not a number issue? Are Zero and infinity somehow inextricably linked?

None mathematician view of the question
 
pinball1970 said:
If we cannot divide by zero then is it not considered a number?

A number on the number line -2, -1, 0, 1, 2?

The number between -1 and 1?
Zero is a number. The fact that division by zero is not defined has no bearing on whether it is a number.
pinball1970 said:
Dividing a number by -1 has a value also 1 and also 0.1, 0.01, 0.001 etc ie approaching infinity so what is happening between the area where everything is undefined before it appears on the negative side?
With something mysterious in between?
Not sure what you're asking here. You can divide any real number by any other real number except zero. The divisor can be as small as you like, just as long as it is not zero.
pinball1970 said:
Ie is this an infinity is a concept not a number issue? Are Zero and infinity somehow inextricably linked?
Yes, infinity is a concept unless you're talking about the extended real numbers.
 
  • Informative
Likes pinball1970
Suppose ,instead of the usual x,y coordinate system with an I basis vector along the x -axis and a corresponding j basis vector along the y-axis we instead have a different pair of basis vectors ,call them e and f along their respective axes. I have seen that this is an important subject in maths My question is what physical applications does such a model apply to? I am asking here because I have devoted quite a lot of time in the past to understanding convectors and the dual...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...

Similar threads

Replies
14
Views
2K
Replies
142
Views
9K
Replies
4
Views
1K
Replies
17
Views
2K
2
Replies
61
Views
9K
Back
Top