Math Textbooks: Error-Filled & Irritating?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

Math textbooks, even in their later editions, frequently contain errors that frustrate students and hinder learning. Authors and publishers often struggle to catch every mistake due to the extensive length of these texts, which can exceed 1000 pages. Despite the proofreading efforts, errors in calculations and factual information persist, leading to confusion among readers. Students are encouraged to report these errors to facilitate corrections and improve future editions.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of mathematical concepts and problem-solving techniques
  • Familiarity with textbook editions and their revisions
  • Basic knowledge of proofreading and error reporting processes
  • Experience with self-study and independent learning strategies
NEXT STEPS
  • Research effective methods for reporting textbook errors to publishers
  • Explore strategies for self-proofreading and error correction in academic texts
  • Investigate the role of peer reviews in academic publishing
  • Learn about the impact of first editions on textbook accuracy and sales
USEFUL FOR

Students, educators, and academic authors who are dealing with error-prone textbooks and seeking to improve their learning experience or the quality of educational materials.

GregA
Messages
210
Reaction score
0
[Rant] How is it possible that maths textbooks by reputable authors in their 2nd, 3rd, or even later publication can still be littered with errors in the answers...Isn't there supposed to be some form of proofing mechanism such that the *overwhelming* majority of errors get weeded out? :confused: (I find one or two every chapter in one of mine :frown: )...I hate the fact that I can spend ages trying to figure out where the hell I went wrong both in my working and in concept before reaching the conclusion that the book is talking BS [/Rant]

I feel much better now :biggrin:
 
Last edited:
Mathematics news on Phys.org
I hate it when texts are full of errors! My chemistry textbook is on it's 8th edition now and there are still calculation and even factual errors in it.
 
Are you reporting the errors?

It's hard for them to fix the errors if nobody is reporting them.
 
The people who write texts do put a lot of effort into proofreading, but some of these texts are 1000 pages or more. Its impossible to catch every error. You'd have to be the Donald Knuth of textbook authors (yes, I know he wrote a text, that's not the point).
 
i don't mind if there are mistakes in my books. i just fix them, & it makes for a good exericise to rewrite a definition/proof etc so that it makes sense. lol i had an instructor who asked us what we thought the 1st mistake was in folland's advanced calculus book. i think he said it was the cover; it was mistitled in the first couple pages lol. my copy of jay devore's stats text has some pretty bad typos, like in page numbers, etc. the index and contents said one thing and the thing i was looking for was 10 pages ahead (or behind... can't remember). at least i got it for free because it's the 1st edition & i guess 1st editions never sell.
 
Last edited:
Point taken folks... :smile: The only gripes I have with the texts I'm using are the errors really, and I should probably learn to chill...and make the effort to log them down as I find em.

I just get flustered and annoyed when trying to sift through all my working and start looking for rules/exceptions to invent that might explain my *wrong* answers.
 
Last edited:
GregA said:
Point taken folks... :smile: The only gripes I have with the texts I'm using are the errors really, and I should probably learn to chill...and make the effort to log them down as I find em.

I just get flustered and annoyed when trying to sift through all my working and start looking for rules/exceptions to invent that might explain my *wrong* answers.


It is definitely frustrating as a student when you spend an hour or more trying to figure out where you went wrong and find out its actually an error in the text. But hopefully that hour is not wasted as you spend time reviewing your method and cementing it in your mind.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
8K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
4K
  • Sticky
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
12K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
4K