I Mathematical proof for the Lagrangian function

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the relationship between the homogeneity of space and the form of the Lagrangian function in mechanics, specifically arguing that the Lagrangian should depend only on the square of the velocity, v^2. The argument presented suggests that if the Lagrangian function were to depend on position, it would be impossible to find a function that satisfies the conditions imposed by homogeneity. Participants emphasize the need for mathematical proofs to establish the constraints of temporal homogeneity and spatial isotropy on the Lagrangian. There is also a suggestion to explore the implications of multiple symmetries to strengthen the argument. Overall, the conversation seeks a rigorous mathematical foundation for these physical principles.
Silver2007
Messages
7
Reaction score
2
TL;DR Summary
In Landau's mechanics book, I saw them argue that due to the homogeneity of time and space, the isotropy of space leads to the Lagrangian function depending only on v^2. But i want a mathematical proof for the Lagrangian function independent of position q, time t and velocity vector.
In Landau's mechanics book, I saw them argue that due to the homogeneity of time and space, the isotropy of space leads to the Lagrangian function depending only on v^2. But i want a mathematical proof for the Lagrangian function independent of position q, time t and velocity vector.
Homogeneity of space:
We have ## \mathcal{L}(\vec{r}, \vec{\dot{r}}, t) ##, and ## \vec{r} \to \vec{r}' = \vec{r} + \vec{a} ##, because homogeneity of space so equations of motion should be the same. Therefore, the Lagrangian function differs only by a total derivative with respect to time ## \Omega(\vec{r}, t) ##:
$$
\mathcal{L}' = \mathcal{L} + \frac{d}{dt}\Omega(\vec{r}, t)
$$
We assume that ## a \ll 1 ##, and we get:
$$
\vec{a} \cdot \frac{\partial \mathcal{L}}{\partial \vec{r}} = \frac{d\Omega}{dt}
$$
At this point, I argue that if the Lagrangian function depends on position, it will be impossible to find an function ##\Omega(\vec{r}, t)## that satisfies the above equation, so the Lagrangian function cannot depend on position. Is my argument above reasonable and coherent?

And I need help with similar mathematical proofs for temporal homogeneity and spatial isotropy. Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Silver2007 said:
And I need help with similar mathematical proofs for temporal homogeneity and spatial isotropy. Thanks
How do you suppose these could be proved mathematically? Space and time are related to the physical universe. You can only assume they are homogeneous and isotropic - or prove this from more fundamental physical assumptions. Mathematics would not be compromised if space were non-homogeneous. In fact, you always have to be prepared for evidence that, say, space is not homogeneous.
 
PeroK said:
How do you suppose these could be proved mathematically? Space and time are related to the physical universe. You can only assume they are homogeneous and isotropic - or prove this from more fundamental physical assumptions. Mathematics would not be compromised if space were non-homogeneous. In fact, you always have to be prepared for evidence that, say, space is not homogeneous.
Sure, but OP is asking under the assumption that the laws of physics are say homogeneous with respect to time and space, then how do you show that this constrains the Lagrangian to be only a function of velocity squared.
 
jbergman said:
Sure, but OP is asking under the assumption that the laws of physics are say homogeneous with respect to time and space, then how do you show that this constrains the Lagrangian to be only a function of velocity squared.
If you read my post, you'll see I answered his second question. Which was:

Silver2007 said:
And I need help with similar mathematical proofs for temporal homogeneity and spatial isotropy. Thanks
 
Silver2007 said:
TL;DR Summary: In Landau's mechanics book, I saw them argue that due to the homogeneity of time and space, the isotropy of space leads to the Lagrangian function depending only on v^2. But i want a mathematical proof for the Lagrangian function independent of position q, time t and velocity vector.

In Landau's mechanics book, I saw them argue that due to the homogeneity of time and space, the isotropy of space leads to the Lagrangian function depending only on v^2. But i want a mathematical proof for the Lagrangian function independent of position q, time t and velocity vector.
Homogeneity of space:
We have ## \mathcal{L}(\vec{r}, \vec{\dot{r}}, t) ##, and ## \vec{r} \to \vec{r}' = \vec{r} + \vec{a} ##, because homogeneity of space so equations of motion should be the same. Therefore, the Lagrangian function differs only by a total derivative with respect to time ## \Omega(\vec{r}, t) ##:
$$
\mathcal{L}' = \mathcal{L} + \frac{d}{dt}\Omega(\vec{r}, t)
$$
We assume that ## a \ll 1 ##, and we get:
$$
\vec{a} \cdot \frac{\partial \mathcal{L}}{\partial \vec{r}} = \frac{d\Omega}{dt}
$$
At this point, I argue that if the Lagrangian function depends on position, it will be impossible to find an function ##\Omega(\vec{r}, t)## that satisfies the above equation, so the Lagrangian function cannot depend on position. Is my argument above reasonable and coherent?

And I need help with similar mathematical proofs for temporal homogeneity and spatial isotropy. Thanks
What about something like##\Omega(\vec{r}, t)=\vec{r} ^2##?

I suggest proving it first without the total derivative term. To prove there isn't a total derivative difference is harder and I am not sure it is true. I believe you would have to at least use multiple symmetries to show it.
 
Thread 'Gauss' law seems to imply instantaneous electric field'
Imagine a charged sphere at the origin connected through an open switch to a vertical grounded wire. We wish to find an expression for the horizontal component of the electric field at a distance ##\mathbf{r}## from the sphere as it discharges. By using the Lorenz gauge condition: $$\nabla \cdot \mathbf{A} + \frac{1}{c^2}\frac{\partial \phi}{\partial t}=0\tag{1}$$ we find the following retarded solutions to the Maxwell equations If we assume that...
Hello! Let's say I have a cavity resonant at 10 GHz with a Q factor of 1000. Given the Lorentzian shape of the cavity, I can also drive the cavity at, say 100 MHz. Of course the response will be very very weak, but non-zero given that the Loretzian shape never really reaches zero. I am trying to understand how are the magnetic and electric field distributions of the field at 100 MHz relative to the ones at 10 GHz? In particular, if inside the cavity I have some structure, such as 2 plates...
Back
Top