I Mathematical proof for the Lagrangian function

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the relationship between the homogeneity of space and the form of the Lagrangian function in mechanics, specifically arguing that the Lagrangian should depend only on the square of the velocity, v^2. The argument presented suggests that if the Lagrangian function were to depend on position, it would be impossible to find a function that satisfies the conditions imposed by homogeneity. Participants emphasize the need for mathematical proofs to establish the constraints of temporal homogeneity and spatial isotropy on the Lagrangian. There is also a suggestion to explore the implications of multiple symmetries to strengthen the argument. Overall, the conversation seeks a rigorous mathematical foundation for these physical principles.
Silver2007
Messages
7
Reaction score
2
TL;DR Summary
In Landau's mechanics book, I saw them argue that due to the homogeneity of time and space, the isotropy of space leads to the Lagrangian function depending only on v^2. But i want a mathematical proof for the Lagrangian function independent of position q, time t and velocity vector.
In Landau's mechanics book, I saw them argue that due to the homogeneity of time and space, the isotropy of space leads to the Lagrangian function depending only on v^2. But i want a mathematical proof for the Lagrangian function independent of position q, time t and velocity vector.
Homogeneity of space:
We have ## \mathcal{L}(\vec{r}, \vec{\dot{r}}, t) ##, and ## \vec{r} \to \vec{r}' = \vec{r} + \vec{a} ##, because homogeneity of space so equations of motion should be the same. Therefore, the Lagrangian function differs only by a total derivative with respect to time ## \Omega(\vec{r}, t) ##:
$$
\mathcal{L}' = \mathcal{L} + \frac{d}{dt}\Omega(\vec{r}, t)
$$
We assume that ## a \ll 1 ##, and we get:
$$
\vec{a} \cdot \frac{\partial \mathcal{L}}{\partial \vec{r}} = \frac{d\Omega}{dt}
$$
At this point, I argue that if the Lagrangian function depends on position, it will be impossible to find an function ##\Omega(\vec{r}, t)## that satisfies the above equation, so the Lagrangian function cannot depend on position. Is my argument above reasonable and coherent?

And I need help with similar mathematical proofs for temporal homogeneity and spatial isotropy. Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Silver2007 said:
And I need help with similar mathematical proofs for temporal homogeneity and spatial isotropy. Thanks
How do you suppose these could be proved mathematically? Space and time are related to the physical universe. You can only assume they are homogeneous and isotropic - or prove this from more fundamental physical assumptions. Mathematics would not be compromised if space were non-homogeneous. In fact, you always have to be prepared for evidence that, say, space is not homogeneous.
 
PeroK said:
How do you suppose these could be proved mathematically? Space and time are related to the physical universe. You can only assume they are homogeneous and isotropic - or prove this from more fundamental physical assumptions. Mathematics would not be compromised if space were non-homogeneous. In fact, you always have to be prepared for evidence that, say, space is not homogeneous.
Sure, but OP is asking under the assumption that the laws of physics are say homogeneous with respect to time and space, then how do you show that this constrains the Lagrangian to be only a function of velocity squared.
 
jbergman said:
Sure, but OP is asking under the assumption that the laws of physics are say homogeneous with respect to time and space, then how do you show that this constrains the Lagrangian to be only a function of velocity squared.
If you read my post, you'll see I answered his second question. Which was:

Silver2007 said:
And I need help with similar mathematical proofs for temporal homogeneity and spatial isotropy. Thanks
 
Silver2007 said:
TL;DR Summary: In Landau's mechanics book, I saw them argue that due to the homogeneity of time and space, the isotropy of space leads to the Lagrangian function depending only on v^2. But i want a mathematical proof for the Lagrangian function independent of position q, time t and velocity vector.

In Landau's mechanics book, I saw them argue that due to the homogeneity of time and space, the isotropy of space leads to the Lagrangian function depending only on v^2. But i want a mathematical proof for the Lagrangian function independent of position q, time t and velocity vector.
Homogeneity of space:
We have ## \mathcal{L}(\vec{r}, \vec{\dot{r}}, t) ##, and ## \vec{r} \to \vec{r}' = \vec{r} + \vec{a} ##, because homogeneity of space so equations of motion should be the same. Therefore, the Lagrangian function differs only by a total derivative with respect to time ## \Omega(\vec{r}, t) ##:
$$
\mathcal{L}' = \mathcal{L} + \frac{d}{dt}\Omega(\vec{r}, t)
$$
We assume that ## a \ll 1 ##, and we get:
$$
\vec{a} \cdot \frac{\partial \mathcal{L}}{\partial \vec{r}} = \frac{d\Omega}{dt}
$$
At this point, I argue that if the Lagrangian function depends on position, it will be impossible to find an function ##\Omega(\vec{r}, t)## that satisfies the above equation, so the Lagrangian function cannot depend on position. Is my argument above reasonable and coherent?

And I need help with similar mathematical proofs for temporal homogeneity and spatial isotropy. Thanks
What about something like##\Omega(\vec{r}, t)=\vec{r} ^2##?

I suggest proving it first without the total derivative term. To prove there isn't a total derivative difference is harder and I am not sure it is true. I believe you would have to at least use multiple symmetries to show it.
 
Thread 'Question about pressure of a liquid'
I am looking at pressure in liquids and I am testing my idea. The vertical tube is 100m, the contraption is filled with water. The vertical tube is very thin(maybe 1mm^2 cross section). The area of the base is ~100m^2. Will he top half be launched in the air if suddenly it cracked?- assuming its light enough. I want to test my idea that if I had a thin long ruber tube that I lifted up, then the pressure at "red lines" will be high and that the $force = pressure * area$ would be massive...
I feel it should be solvable we just need to find a perfect pattern, and there will be a general pattern since the forces acting are based on a single function, so..... you can't actually say it is unsolvable right? Cause imaging 3 bodies actually existed somwhere in this universe then nature isn't gonna wait till we predict it! And yea I have checked in many places that tiny changes cause large changes so it becomes chaos........ but still I just can't accept that it is impossible to solve...
Back
Top