Maths used in Quantum physics, specifically particle physics

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the specific mathematical tools used in quantum physics and particle physics, with a focus on understanding the logic behind their application in solving physical problems. Participants explore the types of mathematics that are relevant, the reasoning for their use, and the challenges faced by those new to the subject.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested
  • Homework-related

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants inquire about the specific mathematical tools used in quantum and particle physics, beyond general terms like "Calculus."
  • There is a suggestion that certain areas of mathematics, such as number theory, may not be applicable, while others, like lattices, could be relevant.
  • One participant emphasizes that mathematics serves as a language to describe physical models, highlighting the natural relationship between measurements and mathematical concepts.
  • Another participant questions the role of calculus in solving problems, specifically asking why calculus operations are necessary for finding solutions in physics.
  • A later reply notes that the choice of mathematical tools is based on their suitability for the problems at hand, but acknowledges that a detailed discussion is beyond the scope of the thread.
  • One participant expresses their lack of advanced knowledge in quantum physics and mathematics, seeking clarity on the topic.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally agree that mathematics is essential for describing physical concepts, but there is no consensus on which specific mathematical tools are most relevant or how they should be applied in various contexts. The discussion remains unresolved regarding the specifics of mathematical applications in quantum physics.

Contextual Notes

Participants express varying levels of familiarity with advanced mathematics and quantum physics, which may limit the depth of the discussion. The complexity of the topic and the participants' educational backgrounds contribute to the challenges in addressing the questions raised.

Who May Find This Useful

This discussion may be of interest to students beginning their studies in physics or mathematics, educators seeking to understand common questions from learners, and individuals curious about the intersection of mathematics and physical theories.

ChrisisC
Messages
54
Reaction score
4
What are the main maths used in the mentioned fields of physics? Not just general terms like "Calculus" but more specific maths. Also, what is the logic behind using these to solve problems in physics? Example, why would someone use differential calculus to calculate the probability of a particle tunneling through a barrier? ( i don't know if you would actually use differential calculus to solve a problem like that, I am just trying to present my question better.)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
ChrisisC said:
What are the main maths used in the mentioned fields of physics? Not just general terms like "Calculus" but more specific maths.
I think even the question, which parts are not used, is hardly answerable. Maybe number theory isn't. Lattices on the other hand ...
Also, what is the logic behind using these to solve problems in physics? Example, why would someone use differential calculus to calculate the probability of a particle tunneling through a barrier? ( i don't know if you would actually use differential calculus to solve a problem like that, I am just trying to present my question better.)
Mathematics is simply a convenient language to describe physical models. How would you express physical concepts like velocity, if not as a quotient of position and time difference? It is simply very natural, because physics is based on experiments which are based on measurements. And the moment you measure something you deal with numbers. Those numbers turn in mathematical concepts, the moment you start to think about physical laws, i.e. amount and kind of dependencies among your measured data like velocity.
 
fresh_42 said:
I think even the question, which parts are not used, is hardly answerable. Maybe number theory isn't. Lattices on the other hand ...

Mathematics is simply a convenient language to describe physical models. How would you express physical concepts like velocity, if not as a quotient of position and time difference? It is simply very natural, because physics is based on experiments which are based on measurements. And the moment you measure something you deal with numbers. Those numbers turn in mathematical concepts, the moment you start to think about physical laws, i.e. amount and kind of dependencies among your measured data like velocity.

I understand what you are saying, but the velocity formula is algebra,is it not? I'm asking why the operations related to calculus and other maths are used to find solutions to different problems. I'm in 10th grade and have never been taught quantum physics or advanced math yet so please excuse my lack of knowledge or the lack of clarity in my questions.
 
This is way too general a question for a PF thread. The general answer is that the mathematical tools that are used are chosen because they seem to be suited for the types of problems to which they are applied. But a detailed discussion of that is way beyond the scope of a PF thread. Accordingly, I am closing this thread.

ChrisisC said:
I'm in 10th grade and have never been taught quantum physics or advanced math yet

Unfortunately, the best advice I can give at this point is patience. It takes time to learn all this stuff, and that includes time to understand why the particular mathematical tools that are used were chosen. There is no simple answer that can be put into a thread like this. But eventually you will learn the tools and be able to use them to solve problems, and that will hopefully show you why they are useful.

If you want to try to get a jump on that process, you could pick a reasonably simple problem (such as quantum tunneling through a barrier) and try to find a presentation of how that problem is solved and see if you can understand it. Then, if you had questions, they would be much more specific and would be easier to address within the scope of a PF thread.

(And unfortunately, yes, most physics problems do require calculus. No way to avoid it, much as many people would like to. :wink:)
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: bhobba

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 42 ·
2
Replies
42
Views
6K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
3K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
395
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
1K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K