MHB Matrices- conditions for unique and no solution

lyd123
Messages
11
Reaction score
0
Hi,how do I go about answering the attached question? I know that for a matrix to have no solution, there needs to be a contradiction in some row. Unique solutions is when m* ${x}_{3}$ =c , where m* ${x}_{3}$ $\ne$ 0.

One way I tried was if a=0,
then from row (1) : b* ${x}_{3}$ =2
${x}_{3}$= 2/b (from row 2 : 2/b = 1 , so b=2)

then from row (2) : 4* ${x}_{3}$ =4
${x}_{3}$= 1

then from row (3) : 2* ${x}_{3}$ =b
${x}_{3}$= b/2 (from row 2 : b/2 = 1 , so b=2)

This seems to work, so when a=0, and b =1 , you have unique solutions?

How do I answer this question? Thanks.View attachment 8733
 

Attachments

  • 2019-01-02.png
    2019-01-02.png
    3.7 KB · Views: 155
Physics news on Phys.org
I see no reason not to just go ahead and try to solve the system. Since it is already in "augmented matrix form", row reduce the matrix. Start by subtracting the first row from the second row to get \begin{bmatrix}a & 0 & b & | & 2 \\ 0 & a & 4- b & | & 2 \\ 0 & a & 2 & | & b \end{bmatrix}.

Now subtract the second row from the third to get \begin{bmatrix}a & 0 & b & | & 2 \\ 0 & a & 4- b & | & 2 \\ 0 & 0 & b- 2 & | & b- 2\end{bmatrix}.

We now have the equations (b- 2)z= b- 2, ay+ (4- b)z= 2, and ax+ bz= 2. From the first equation we can say if b\ne 2 then z= 1. In that case the second equation becomes ay+ 4- b= 2 so ay= b- 2 and, if a\ne 0, y= \frac{b- 2}{a}. In that case the third equation becomes ax+ b= 2 so again, if a\ne 0, z= \frac{2- b}{a}. If b\ne 2 and a\ne 0 there is a unique solution.

Now, what if, in the case that b\ne 2, a is 0? In that case, the second equation becomes b- 2= 0 which, since this is the case b\ne 0 is impossible. In the case that b\ne 2, a= 0, there is no solution.

What if b= 2? In that case the first equation is satisfied for z any number. If a is not 0, we have y= \frac{2- (4- b)z}{a} and x= \frac{2- bz}{a} for all values of z so there are infinitely many solutions.

Last, what if b= 2 and a= 0? The equations reduce to 0= , 0= 2, and 2z= 2. 0= 2 is false no matter what x, y, and z are so there is no solution.
 
Makes perfect sense to me now!
 
Thread 'How to define a vector field?'
Hello! In one book I saw that function ##V## of 3 variables ##V_x, V_y, V_z## (vector field in 3D) can be decomposed in a Taylor series without higher-order terms (partial derivative of second power and higher) at point ##(0,0,0)## such way: I think so: higher-order terms can be neglected because partial derivative of second power and higher are equal to 0. Is this true? And how to define vector field correctly for this case? (In the book I found nothing and my attempt was wrong...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
5K