Matrices in reduced row-echelon form

  • Thread starter Tonyt88
  • Start date
  • #1
Tonyt88
62
0

Homework Statement


Determine which of the matrices below are in reduced row-echelon form:
a)
1_2_0_2_0
0_0_1_3_0
0_0_1_4_0
0_0_0_0_1

b)
0_1_2_0_3
0_0_0_1_4
0_0_0_0_0

c)
1_2_0_3
0_0_0_0
0_0_1_2

d)
0_1_2_3_4



Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution


Okay, so I know for sure that (a) is not in reduced row-echelon form because the leading one in row 2 had a nonzero value in its column.

(b) is in reduced row-echelon form.

(c) is the one I'm most curious about. I feel that since there is a leading 1 in row 3, but that there is no leading 1 in row two (and to the left at that) that it's not in reduced row-echelon form, is this correct?

(d) I feel confident is in reduced row-echelon form.

Are all my thoughts correct?
 

Answers and Replies

  • #2
radou
Homework Helper
3,134
7
(c) is the one I'm most curious about. I feel that since there is a leading 1 in row 3, but that there is no leading 1 in row two (and to the left at that) that it's not in reduced row-echelon form, is this correct?

If it is so, what do you propose to reduce it? :wink:
 
  • #3
Tonyt88
62
0
To reduce it would you switch row 2 and 3?
 
  • #4
radou
Homework Helper
3,134
7
To reduce it would you switch row 2 and 3?

You do not need to switch row 2 and 3. Only for the sake of aesthetics, perhaps. The system if completely reduced and you can read out all relevant information from the matrix.
 
  • #5
jalexanal
1
0
radou is right: you do not need to swap row 2 and row 3, but "reduced row echelon form" has a formal definition and it is necessary to swap row 2 with row 3 to put c) in that form.
 
  • #6
HallsofIvy
Science Advisor
Homework Helper
43,021
970
Well, I agree with the last part of what jalexanal said but, as a result, I would have to say "radou is wrong"! Just for solving equations or related problems, the order of rows does not matter but for this problem, to tell whether or not the matrices are in "reduced row echelon" form, it does matter. In reduced row echlon form, there must be no rows below a given row with first non-zero member further to the left.
 

Suggested for: Matrices in reduced row-echelon form

  • Last Post
Replies
1
Views
178
Replies
1
Views
197
Replies
23
Views
520
  • Last Post
Replies
13
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
381
  • Last Post
Replies
5
Views
593
  • Last Post
Replies
1
Views
708
Replies
2
Views
471
Replies
25
Views
1K
Replies
4
Views
250
Top