Matrices:- Range and null space

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on the concepts of range and null space in linear algebra, specifically in relation to solving a matrix equation. The user successfully identified the basis for the range as {(2, 3, -1), (1, 4, 2)} and the basis for the null space as {(-3, 2, 0, 1), (2, -3, 1, 0)}. The user encountered difficulties in determining the value of k and understanding the role of the range space in calculating particular solutions. The explanation clarifies that the range space encompasses all possible outputs of the matrix, influencing the constraints on k.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of linear algebra concepts, specifically range and null space.
  • Familiarity with matrix equations and their solutions.
  • Knowledge of vector spaces and their properties.
  • Ability to interpret geometric representations of linear equations.
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of vector spaces, focusing on range and null space.
  • Learn about the geometric interpretation of linear equations and their solutions.
  • Explore the concept of kernel and its relationship to matrix transformations.
  • Investigate methods for finding particular solutions to matrix equations.
USEFUL FOR

Students studying linear algebra, particularly those tackling matrix equations and seeking to understand the implications of range and null space in their solutions.

Faiq
Messages
347
Reaction score
16

Homework Statement


Question is uploaded
I have completed till part iii and obtained correct answers
i. 2
ii. Basis for R:- { ( 2 3 -1 ) , (1 4 2 ) }
Cartesian equation; 2x-y+z=0
iii. Basis for Null:- { ( -3 2 0 1 ) , (2 -3 1 0 ) }

2. The attempt at a solution
I have problem in last part. I have calculated the value of k to be -9 but I can't proceed further.
I have two major queries.

1. I understand the main concept is to use a particular solution and then add some "gradient" to get an equation which will generate solutions. However why do we use the range space to calculate the particular solution?

2. Why is the general equation of the form
x = particular solution + a(1st Basis for Null vector) +b (2nd basis of null vector ) + ( in this case nothing)...
Or more precisely why are the basis of null vector used as "gradients"?

I am pre-uni student so I will be very delighted if the answers doesn't contain very complicated language.
 

Attachments

  • Matrices.jpg
    Matrices.jpg
    24.1 KB · Views: 1,780
Physics news on Phys.org
Faiq said:

Homework Statement


Question is uploaded
I have completed till part iii and obtained correct answers
i. 2
ii. Basis for R:- { ( 2 3 -1 ) , (1 4 2 ) }
Cartesian equation; 2x-y+z=0
iii. Basis for Null:- { ( -3 2 0 1 ) , (2 -3 1 0 ) }

2. The attempt at a solution
I have problem in last part. I have calculated the value of k to be -9 but I can't proceed further.
I have two major queries.

1. I understand the main concept is to use a particular solution and then add some "gradient" to get an equation which will generate solutions. However why do we use the range space to calculate the particular solution?

The range space is everything you can possibly get; therefore b must be in the range if there exists a v such that Mv = b.

Here, not every vector in \mathbb{R}^4 is in the range; this limits the value of k. Geometrically (8, 7, k) is a line parallel to the z-axis which doesn't pass through the origin, and R is a plane containing the origin which is not parallel to the z-axis; these must therefore intersect at a unique point.

2. Why is the general equation of the form
x = particular solution + a(1st Basis for Null vector) +b (2nd basis of null vector ) + ( in this case nothing)...
Or more precisely why are the basis of null vector used as "gradients"?

By definition, if u \in \ker M then Mu = 0. Thus if v is such that Mv = b then M(v + u) = Mv = b.
 
Oh so technically we are just finding the coordinates of the intersection and then finding the value of k. After obtaining the matrix, we treat it as a position vector and then find the equation of a line which when substituted in the equation of plane gives us (8 7 -9).
I don't know whether my phrasing makes sense but the algebra in the last part of your answer made it all clear
 

Similar threads

Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 32 ·
2
Replies
32
Views
3K
Replies
14
Views
7K
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K