Proving the Diagonalizability of a Real 2x2 Matrix Using Invertible Matrices

Click For Summary
A 2x2 real matrix A that cannot be diagonalized must have a single eigenvalue and only one eigenvector. To prove the existence of an invertible matrix P such that P^{-1}AP has a specific Jordan form, it is suggested to choose a basis consisting of the eigenvector and an orthogonal vector. This approach helps in analyzing the transformation associated with matrix A in a suitable basis. The significance of the orthogonal vector lies in simplifying the representation of the matrix transformation. Understanding these concepts is crucial for proving the diagonalizability condition in this context.
flash
Messages
66
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Let A be a 2x2 real matrix which cannot be diagonalized by any matrix P (real or complex). Prove there is an invertible real 2x2 matrix P such that

<br /> P^{-1}AP = \left( \begin{array}{cc} \lambda &amp; 1 \\ 0 &amp; \lambda \end{array} \right)<br />

I know how to diagonalize a matrix by using eigenvectors but I don't think that really helps here. I tried proving it by letting A be {a, b, c, d} and P be {e, f, g, h} but it gets really messy and I don't think that's the right way to do it. Any help appreciated!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Well, it does help a little. It means you know that if a 2 by 2 matrix has two independent eigenvectors, then it can be diagonalized. And, of course, if the matrix has two distinct eigenvalues, then their eigenvectors are independent. Here, your matrix must have only one eigenvalue (which may be complex) and only one eigenvector. You might try this: choose your basis so that one of the basis vectors is that eigenvector and the other is orthogonal to it.
 
Thanks. So do you mean: view the transformation associated with matrix A in a basis of {eigenvector, orthogonal to eigenvector} and find the matrix for the transformation in this basis?
I'm not sure what the significance of the orthogonal vector is here.
 
Question: A clock's minute hand has length 4 and its hour hand has length 3. What is the distance between the tips at the moment when it is increasing most rapidly?(Putnam Exam Question) Answer: Making assumption that both the hands moves at constant angular velocities, the answer is ## \sqrt{7} .## But don't you think this assumption is somewhat doubtful and wrong?

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K