Matrix elements of position operator in infinite well basis

Click For Summary
The discussion focuses on finding the eigenfunctions of a particle in an infinite well and expressing the position operator in that basis. The integral representation of the position operator is confirmed as correct, with emphasis on proper notation for eigenfunctions. Participants clarify that the eigenvalues are used to denote eigenkets, while the wavefunctions should be indexed differently to avoid confusion. The conversation highlights that the state representation does not need to differentiate between wavefunction notations. Overall, the participants agree on the correctness of the mathematical approach and notation used in the solution.
carllacan
Messages
272
Reaction score
3

Homework Statement


Find the eigenfunctions of a particle in a infinite well and express the position operator in the basis of said functions.

Homework Equations


The Attempt at a Solution



Tell me if I'm right so far (the |E> are the eigenkets)
X_{ij}= \langle E_i \vert \hat{X} \vert E_j \rangle = \int dx \int dx' \langle E_i \vert x \rangle \langle x \vert \hat{X} \vert x'\rangle \langle x'\vert E_j \rangle
\int dx \int dx' \Psi_i^*(x) x\delta_{x, x'} \Psi_j(x') = \int dx \Psi_i^*(x) x \Psi_j(x)
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Modify your notation for the eigenfunctions.
Using E to denote an eigenfunction is very confusing.
You can read on wikipedia about the eigenfunctions for an infinite well:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Particle_in_a_box
If I guessed your notations correctly, you are starting in the right direction.
 
The eigenvalues Ei are only used to denote their respective eigenkets, the wavefunctions are denoted by the index of the eigenvalue. I think I've seen this in many books.

The last integral is correct then? I was not sure how to handle the delta.
 
Yes it is correct.
By definition, I would say.
It looks more like a change of notation rather than any derivation of something!

X_{ij}= \langle \Psi_i \vert \hat{X} \vert \Psi_j \rangle

Which is indeed the integral you have written!

The state is independent of its representation.
Therefore I see no need to distinguish between

\langle \Psi_i \vert \hat{X} \vert \Psi_j \rangle

and

\langle E_i \vert \hat{X} \vert E_j \rangle
 
  • Like
Likes 1 person
Yes, you are right, but I first needed to state it in terms of the wavefunctions, and I wasn't quite sure if I had done it right.

Thanks.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
1K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
16
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
4K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K