Matrix form of Density Operator

Click For Summary
The discussion revolves around understanding the matrix form of the density operator in quantum mechanics. Peter Yu seeks clarity on the notation and concepts presented in "Quantum Mechanics - The Theoretical Minimum." Participants explain that the density matrix represents the expectation value of an observable for a subsystem within an entangled system. They detail how to calculate the trace of the density operator and its relation to matrix elements, emphasizing the significance of eigenvalues in determining entanglement. The conversation concludes with Peter expressing gratitude for the assistance and indicating the need for time to process the explanations.
Peter Yu
Messages
19
Reaction score
1
Hi All,
I have spent hours trying to understand the matrix form of Density Operator. But, I fail. Please see page 2 of the attached file. (from the book "Quantum Mechanics - The Theoretical Minimum" page 199).
Most appreciated if someone could enlighten me this.
Many thanks in advance.
Peter Yu
 

Attachments

Physics news on Phys.org
I find the notation in that book really awful so let me change the notation. Imagine I have a set of basis vectors ## \{|\varphi_i\rangle\}## and I prepared my system in the mixed state ## \rho=\sum_i p_i |\psi_i\rangle\langle \psi_i |## where ## |\psi_i\rangle=\sum_k c_{ik}|\varphi_k\rangle ##.

The matrix element of an operator L in the above basis are defined to be ## L_{mn}=\langle \varphi_m|L|\varphi_n\rangle ##.

About the second equation, we have ## Tr(\rho L)=\sum_i \langle \varphi_i | \rho L |\varphi_i\rangle ##. Now if I put the above expression of ##\rho## in the formula for trace, I'll have:

## Tr(\rho L)=\sum_i \langle \varphi_i | (\sum_i p_i |\psi_i\rangle\langle \psi_i |) L |\varphi_i\rangle=\sum_i \sum_j p_j\langle \varphi_i |\psi_j\rangle\langle \psi_j | L |\varphi_i\rangle= \\ \\ \sum_i \sum_j p_jc_{ji}(\sum_k c_{jk}^* \langle \varphi_k |) | L |\varphi_i\rangle=\sum_i \sum_j \sum_k p_jc_{ji}c_{jk}^* \langle \varphi_k | L |\varphi_i\rangle= \\ \\ \sum_i \sum_j \sum_k p_jc_{ji}c_{jk}^* L_{ki}=\sum_i\sum_k (\sum_j p_j c_{ji}c_{jk}^*) L_{ki}=\sum_i\sum_k \rho_{ik} L_{ki}##
 
Hello!
Density matrix is a matrix that describes the expectation value(L) of a of a state vector from a quantum subsystem which is a part of composed entangled system.
If you have two systems, each with it's own space of states HA and HB, the density matrix simply gives you the information of one of the subsystems from it's own point of view, the second system being just a simple observer and not interfering with any measurement done on the first.

For determining <L>A from HA X HB (note the product state of the entangled system): <L>A = <ψ(x’y’)|L|ψ(xy)>.
<L>A = Σxy ψ*(x’y’)ψ(xy)Lx’x. Here <x’|L|x> = Lx’x = are just the matrix elements of the observable. If we apply δy’y for <L>A (this means we just replace y' with y), we get Σxy ψ*(x’y)ψ(xy)Lx’x. Now we sum over the eigenvalues of the eigenvectors of the second system y (the observer) just so the first system won't have a dependency on those values, so we can truly measure LA. Therefore<L>A = Σy ψ*(x’y)ψ(xy) Lx’x. ρx’x = Σy ψ*(x’y)ψ(xy) is the density matrix and the more non-zero eigenvectors you find inside the matrix of ρ the more entangled the system is. Maximum entanglement is when all eigenvalues are non-zero, equal and of the 1/n form (n being the dimentionality of the space).
NOTE: Σy = sum over y, since I don't know how to put the value under the sum.
Hope this helped!
 
Last edited:
Hi Shyan and Dyatloc,
Heartfelt thank for your assistance. I need some time to absorb your explanation.
Many Thanks
Peter
 
Time reversal invariant Hamiltonians must satisfy ##[H,\Theta]=0## where ##\Theta## is time reversal operator. However, in some texts (for example see Many-body Quantum Theory in Condensed Matter Physics an introduction, HENRIK BRUUS and KARSTEN FLENSBERG, Corrected version: 14 January 2016, section 7.1.4) the time reversal invariant condition is introduced as ##H=H^*##. How these two conditions are identical?

Similar threads

Replies
0
Views
789
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
13
Views
6K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K