Matrix Homework: Solving for B in Statement 5

  • Thread starter Thread starter athrun200
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Matrix Proofs
Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
5 replies · 2K views
athrun200
Messages
275
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


See question 5


Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution



For part a, it is very easy.
Multiply the inverse of A 2 times on both side, we can see the B=inverse of A.
i.e. The required B is inverse of A, then the proof is finished.

But how about part b?
It seems it is the same part a.

Is part b also correct?
 

Attachments

Physics news on Phys.org
Part b is quite different from part a- and the difference is important to learn. Mathematics must be very very precise in its wording- unlike science we don't have observations and experiments to fall back on. In other words, we can't just look at the real world- words are everything!

In part a it ask if, given a non-singular matrix A, there exist a matrix B such that [itex]AB^2= A[/itex]. You are right- just multiply, on the left, on both sides by [itex]A^{-1}[/itex], which exists because A is non-singular, and the equation becomes AB= I. Yes, B exists and is the inverse of A.

In part B, it asks if there exists a matrix B such that, for any non-singular matrix, A, [itex]A^2B= A[/itex]. "Any" is the crucial word there. Is there a single matrix B that is the inverse of all invertible matrices?
 
HallsofIvy said:
Part b is quite different from part a- and the difference is important to learn. Mathematics must be very very precise in its wording- unlike science we don't have observations and experiments to fall back on. In other words, we can't just look at the real world- words are everything!

In part a it ask if, given a non-singular matrix A, there exist a matrix B such that [itex]AB^2= A[/itex]. You are right- just multiply, on the left, on both sides by [itex]A^{-1}[/itex], which exists because A is non-singular, and the equation becomes AB= I. Yes, B exists and is the inverse of A.

In part B, it asks if there exists a matrix B such that, for any non-singular matrix, A, [itex]A^2B= A[/itex]. "Any" is the crucial word there. Is there a single matrix B that is the inverse of all invertible matrices?

Well, after listening to your explanation, I know part b is obvious wrong.
However, I wonder how to write it out.
 
HallsofIvy said:
"No, there does not exist a single matrix, B, such that [itex]A^2B= A[/itex] for all non-singular matrices, A."

Oh, this is the prove?
 
Let me try for part d.

Since [itex]A[/itex] is non-singular, [itex]A^{-1}[/itex] exists.
So [itex]\vec{x}[/itex]=[itex]A^{-1}[/itex][itex]\vec{y}[/itex] exists.

So, there exists [itex]\vec{x}[/itex] s.t. [itex]A[/itex][itex]\vec{x}[/itex]=[itex]\vec{y}[/itex]

Again, how to disprove part c?
By simply saying NO, there doesn't exist?