Matrix multiplication to addition

Click For Summary
The discussion centers on the possibility of transforming a matrix product into a matrix addition, specifically in the form AB = PA + QB. It is generally concluded that such a transformation is not feasible due to dimensional mismatches; for the equation to hold, specific conditions on the dimensions of matrices P and Q must be met, which are quite restrictive. A trivial solution exists where P equals the zero matrix and Q equals A, but this does not provide a meaningful transformation. The conversation also touches on the potential for "clever" methods to achieve a related transformation involving functions applied to matrices. Ultimately, the consensus is that the proposed transformation does not hold under standard conditions.
yiorgos
Messages
18
Reaction score
0
I am looking for a transformation that relates a matrix product with a matrix addition, e.g.
AB = PA + QB

Is there any such transformation?
Thnx
 
Physics news on Phys.org
In general, the answer would be no, simply because of a dimensional mismatch.
Suppose A is an n x m matrix and B is m x r (the first dimension has to be m otherwise AB does not make sense). Then AB is n x r. However, P will be p x n and Q will be q x m, for some numbers p and s (the second coordinate is fixed because the products will have to make sense). All this only works out if p = q = m = r which restricts the validity of the theorem, if it were true, quite a lot.

Oh, and if you do get the dimensions to work out, there is of course the trivial solution P = 0n x m, Q = A.
 
Thanks for the answer.
You are right about the particular transformation yet that was just a naive example I gave.

I am sure there exist "clever" ways to achieve this.

For example
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Logarithm_of_a_matrix

I don't know if that helps more but what I actually need is
the below transformation.
AB*u -> f(A)*u + f(B)*u

where u is a vector and f,g() some functions (like the one in the link I gave)
 
Well, a single number can be thought of as a "one by one" matrix so the first thing you should think about is "if A and B are numbers, do there necessarily exist a function f such that ABu= f(A)u+ f(B)u for every number u?"
 
HallsofIvy said:
Well, a single number can be thought of as a "one by one" matrix so the first thing you should think about is "if A and B are numbers, do there necessarily exist a function f such that ABu= f(A)u+ f(B)u for every number u?"

So in short you are saying that this transformation doesn't hold?
 
Thread 'How to define a vector field?'
Hello! In one book I saw that function ##V## of 3 variables ##V_x, V_y, V_z## (vector field in 3D) can be decomposed in a Taylor series without higher-order terms (partial derivative of second power and higher) at point ##(0,0,0)## such way: I think so: higher-order terms can be neglected because partial derivative of second power and higher are equal to 0. Is this true? And how to define vector field correctly for this case? (In the book I found nothing and my attempt was wrong...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
5K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
4K
  • · Replies 33 ·
2
Replies
33
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K