Matrix representation of ladder operators

Click For Summary
The discussion focuses on finding matrix representations for the ladder operators a+ and a-, which operate in Hilbert space. The participants clarify that a+ can be represented by a matrix, while a- is the conjugate transpose of that matrix. They reference Griffiths' equations related to the harmonic oscillator and express confusion about applying these concepts to the standard basis vectors. The conversation emphasizes the need to understand the action of ladder operators on these vectors to derive the matrix elements effectively. Overall, the participants conclude that using the explicit column vector representation simplifies the process of determining the matrix forms of the operators.
Ed Quanta
Messages
296
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Find the matrices which represent the following ladder operators a+,a_, and a+a-
All of these operators are supposed to operate on Hilbert space, and be represented by m*n matrices.

Homework Equations



a+=1/square root(2hmw)*(-ip+mwx)
a_=1/square root(2hmw)*(ip+mwx)
a+a_= 1/hw*(H) - 1/2


The Attempt at a Solution



I recognize that once I find the matrix which represents a+, a_ will be represented by the conjugate of the transpose of that matrix. I also can then find a+a_ by matrix multiplication. Not sure about anything else though.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Do you know the action of the ladder operators onto the standard basis vectors in the state space ?
 
No clue. There is nothing on this in my Griffiths quantum mechanics text that I have seen.
 
Ed Quanta said:
No clue. There is nothing on this in my Griffiths quantum mechanics text that I have seen.

Griffiths does give the equation. It is 4.120 and 4,121 (given in problem 4.18), Second edition.

L_{\pm} |l, m> = \hbar {\sqrt{l(l+1)-m(m \pm 1)}}|l,m\pm 1>
 
But we haven't gotten to chapter 4 yet, or done anything having to do with angular momentum. The ladder operators were introduced with respect to the harmonic oscillator.

Would I still just plug in values for l and m to find the elements of the matrix?

We were told that
(a+)mn=∫ψn(x)(a+)(ψm(x))dx

And same type of definition for (a_)mn only with a_ instead of a+.

Is there any way for me to come up with the equation in Griffiths 4.120 given this information?

I'm sorry if I am slow.
 
Last edited:
Ed Quanta said:
But we haven't gotten to chapter 4 yet, or done anything having to do with angular momentum. The ladder operators were introduced with respect to the harmonic oscillator.

Would I still just plug in values for l and m to find the elements of the matrix?

We were told that
(a+)mn=∫ψn(x)(a+)(ψm(x))dx

And same type of definition for (a_)mn only with a_ instead of a+.

Is there any way for me to come up with the equation in Griffiths 4.120 given this information?

I'm sorry if I am slow.


My APOLOGIES! I was thinking about the ladder operators for angular momenta (I read replies to your posts but not your initial post in details...my bad!:redface: :redface: :frown: :cry: )

My sincerest apologies.

Ok, what you need then is his equation 2.66, page 48 (in the second edition):

a_+ \psi_n = {\sqrt{n+1}} \psi_{n+1} \,\,\,\,\,\, a_- \psi_n = {\sqrt{n}} \psi_{n-1}

If the \psi_n are represented by explicit column vectors (usually the ones with 1 in one slot and zero and the others), it is easy to use that to find the matrix representations of the ladder operators (they will be matrices with entries below or above the diagonal only)

My apologies, again.

Patrick
 
Thanks agaom. Easier than I thought. That is what I got on wikipedia but I wasn't sure why until now.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
7K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K