Calculating Angle Between E-Field and Current Vectors in Anisotropic Mat.

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around calculating the angle between the current density vector ##\vec j## and the electric field vector ##\vec E## in an anisotropic conductive material, described by a specific relationship involving a constant unit vector ##\vec n##. Participants are also tasked with understanding the implications of a coordinate transformation on the conductivity tensor.

Discussion Character

  • Mixed

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants explore the calculation of the angle between ##\vec j## and ##\vec E##, with one suggesting a method involving the dot product and cosine of the angle. There is uncertainty about whether this is the best approach. Others express confusion regarding the coordinate transformations and their relevance to the problem, questioning the need for eigenvalues and eigenvectors.

Discussion Status

Some participants agree on the approach for part i) and provide insights into the conductivity tensor's diagonal form. There are ongoing discussions about simplifying expressions and verifying calculations, particularly concerning the coordinate transformation and the resulting values for ##\gamma## and ##\bar\sigma##.

Contextual Notes

Participants note the complexity of the problem, particularly in understanding the coordinate transformation and its implications for the conductivity tensor. There is also mention of potential errors in previous calculations that have not yet been resolved.

Karl Karlsson
Messages
104
Reaction score
12
Homework Statement
In a certain anisotropic conductive material, the relationship between the current density ##\vec j## and
the electric field ##\vec E## is given by: ##\vec j = \sigma_0\vec E + \sigma_1\vec n(\vec n\cdot\vec E)## where ##\vec n## is a constant unit vector.

i) Calculate the angle between the vectors ##\vec j## and ##\vec E## if the angle between ##\vec E## and ##\vec n## is α

ii) Now assume that ##\vec n=\vec e_3## and define a coordinate transformation ξ = x, η = y, ζ = γz where γ is a constant. For what value of γ does the conductivity tensor component take the form ##\sigma_{ab} = \bar \sigmaδ_{ab}## and what is the value of the constant ##\bar\sigma## in the new coordinate system?
Relevant Equations
##\vec j = \sigma_0\vec E + \sigma_1\vec n(\vec n\cdot\vec E)##
ξ = x, η = y, ζ = γz
In a certain anisotropic conductive material, the relationship between the current density ##\vec j## and
the electric field ##\vec E## is given by: ##\vec j = \sigma_0\vec E + \sigma_1\vec n(\vec n\cdot\vec E)## where ##\vec n## is a constant unit vector.

i) Calculate the angle between the vectors ##\vec j## and ##\vec E## if the angle between ##\vec E## and ##\vec n## is α

ii) Now assume that ##\vec n=\vec e_3## and define a coordinate transformation ξ = x, η = y, ζ = γz where γ is a constant. For what value of γ does the conductivity tensor component take the form ##\sigma_{ab} = \bar \sigmaδ_{ab}## and what is the value of the constant ##\bar\sigma## in the new coordinate system?My attempt:

I don't really know if I get it into the simplest possible form but i guess one way of solving i) would be:

##\vec E\cdot\vec j = |\vec E|\cdot|\vec j|\cdot cos(\phi)= \sigma_0\vec E^{2} + \sigma_1\vec n\cdot \vec E(\vec n\cdot\vec E) \implies \phi =arccos(\frac {\sigma_0|\vec E^{2}| + \sigma_1\cdot cos(α)\cdot|\vec E|\cdot cos(α)|\cdot|\vec E|} {|\vec E|\cdot|\vec j|})##

Is this the best way to solve this?

On ii) i am completely lost. What do the coordinate transformations mean? x, y and z are not even in the given expression ##\vec j = \sigma_0\vec E + \sigma_1\vec n(\vec n\cdot\vec E)##. I have already found a matrix ##\sigma## that transforms ##\vec E## to ##\vec j##. Do they want me to find eigenvectors and eigenvalues? Why?

Thanks in advance!
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
I agree with your result for part i). For part ii), since you already found the conductivity tensor, you can tell immediately by inspection that the tensor is diagonal with ##\sigma_{xx} = \sigma_{yy}=\sigma_0=\sigma## and ##\sigma_{zz}=\sigma_0 + \sigma_1##. By making the coordinate transformation you are asked to solve,
$$
\begin {pmatrix}
\sigma & 0 & 0 \\
0 & \sigma & 0 \\
0 & 0 & \sigma_0 + \sigma_1 \\
\end {pmatrix}
\begin {pmatrix}
1 & 0 & 0 \\
0 & 1 & 0 \\
0 & 0 & \gamma \\
\end {pmatrix}
=
\begin {pmatrix}
\sigma & 0 & 0 \\
0 & \sigma & 0 \\
0 & 0 & \sigma \\
\end {pmatrix}
$$
 
Fred Wright said:
I agree with your result for part i). For part ii), since you already found the conductivity tensor, you can tell immediately by inspection that the tensor is diagonal with ##\sigma_{xx} = \sigma_{yy}=\sigma_0=\sigma## and ##\sigma_{zz}=\sigma_0 + \sigma_1##. By making the coordinate transformation you are asked to solve,
$$
\begin {pmatrix}
\sigma & 0 & 0 \\
0 & \sigma & 0 \\
0 & 0 & \sigma_0 + \sigma_1 \\
\end {pmatrix}
\begin {pmatrix}
1 & 0 & 0 \\
0 & 1 & 0 \\
0 & 0 & \gamma \\
\end {pmatrix}
=
\begin {pmatrix}
\sigma & 0 & 0 \\
0 & \sigma & 0 \\
0 & 0 & \sigma \\
\end {pmatrix}
$$

Hi Fred!
Are you sure one can't express the answer in i) in any other or simpler way because it feels like my answer for the expression of the angle between ##\vec E## and ##\vec j##Ok! Then I might understand but I would really appreciate verification by someone or comment on what is not correct.

Since ##\vec n## is just ##\vec e_3## i get $$\sigma = \begin{bmatrix}\sigma_0&0&0\\0&\sigma_0&0\\0&0&\sigma_0+1\end{bmatrix}$$.$$\vec E_3(\sigma_0+1)=\sigma_0\cdot\vec E_\zeta$$. I write ##\vec E_\zeta = \gamma\cdot\vec E_3## because of the change of basis matrix
$$\begin {pmatrix}
1 & 0 & 0 \\
0 & 1 & 0 \\
0 & 0 & \gamma \\
\end {pmatrix}
$$
and therefore ##\gamma=1+1/\sigma_0## and ##\bar\sigma = \sigma_0##. Is this correct?
 
Karl Karlsson said:
Are you sure one can't express the answer in i) in any other or simpler way because it feels like my answer for the expression of the angle between ##\vec E## and ##\vec j##
You can simplify your expression by substituting an expression for ##|j|##. I suggest,
$$
j\cdot j=(\sigma_0 \vec E + \sigma_1 \hat n (\hat n \cdot \vec E)\cdot (\sigma_0 \vec E + \sigma_1 \hat n (\hat n \cdot \vec E))=(\sigma_0|\vec E | + \sigma_1 (\hat n \cdot \vec E ))^2
$$
$$
|j|=\sigma_0|\vec E | + \sigma_1 (\hat n \cdot \vec E )
$$
Karl Karlsson said:
Ok! Then I might understand but I would really appreciate verification by someone or comment on what is not correct.

Since ##\vec n## is just ##\vec e_3## i get $$\sigma = \begin{bmatrix}\sigma_0&0&0\\0&\sigma_0&0\\0&0&\sigma_0+1\end{bmatrix}$$.
This is wrong. It should be,
$$
\sigma = \begin {pmatrix}
\sigma_0 & 0 & 0 \\
0 & \sigma_0 & 0 \\
0 & 0 & \sigma_0 +\sigma_1 \\
\end {pmatrix}
$$
and therefore ##\gamma = \frac{\sigma_0}{\sigma_0 + \sigma_1}##.
 

Similar threads

Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
6K