Matter outside of the territory under consideration. Where are we?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Serge58
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Matter Outside
Serge58
Messages
14
Reaction score
0
After an analogy with air and water waves, which are limited in speed by the density of the medium in which they travel, I was wondering if there were variations in the "density" of the vacuum of space which might cause light, or any electromagnetic waves for this matter, to vary in speed.

In reply to this comment harrylin cleverley quoted Einstein from 1920:
harrylin said:
Einstein phrased it in 1920 as follows: "the metrical qualities of the continuum of space-time [..] are partly conditioned by the matter existing outside of the territory under consideration."

Therefore, Where are we today with the understanding of this matter outside of the territory under consideration?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Serge58 said:
Therefore, Where are we today with the understanding of this matter outside of the territory under consideration?

There's no great mystery here. Suppose that the "territory under consideration" is the space near a massive body; the massive body produces gravitational effects within that area. A near-trivial example would be the Schwarzschild solution - it's a vacuum solution so applies in the empty space around the matter that's responsible for the gravitational field.
 
Serge58 said:
After an analogy with air and water waves, which are limited in speed by the density of the medium in which they travel, I was wondering if there were variations in the "density" of the vacuum of space which might cause light, or any electromagnetic waves for this matter, to vary in speed.

The equivalence principle basically says that this can never be the case.

What Einstein probably had in mind was spacetime curvature, not the speed of light. (But it would be helpful to have some more context.)
 
I think i didn't write my question properly. I'll try again on a new tread.
 
OK, so this has bugged me for a while about the equivalence principle and the black hole information paradox. If black holes "evaporate" via Hawking radiation, then they cannot exist forever. So, from my external perspective, watching the person fall in, they slow down, freeze, and redshift to "nothing," but never cross the event horizon. Does the equivalence principle say my perspective is valid? If it does, is it possible that that person really never crossed the event horizon? The...
In this video I can see a person walking around lines of curvature on a sphere with an arrow strapped to his waist. His task is to keep the arrow pointed in the same direction How does he do this ? Does he use a reference point like the stars? (that only move very slowly) If that is how he keeps the arrow pointing in the same direction, is that equivalent to saying that he orients the arrow wrt the 3d space that the sphere is embedded in? So ,although one refers to intrinsic curvature...
So, to calculate a proper time of a worldline in SR using an inertial frame is quite easy. But I struggled a bit using a "rotating frame metric" and now I'm not sure whether I'll do it right. Couls someone point me in the right direction? "What have you tried?" Well, trying to help truly absolute layppl with some variation of a "Circular Twin Paradox" not using an inertial frame of reference for whatevere reason. I thought it would be a bit of a challenge so I made a derivation or...
Back
Top