Matter vs Antimatter: Understanding the Disproportion

  • Thread starter Thread starter GuRuPhysicsGuy
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Antimatter Matter
GuRuPhysicsGuy
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
If virtual particles are popping into and out of existence all the time, why aren'twe? Why aren't the particles that make up everything popping in and out of existence and why is the amount of matter in the universe disproportionate to the amount of antimatter?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
If virtual particles are popping into and out of existence all the time, why aren't we?
Short answer: they aren't.

This is another one of those fairy tales that the popular science media likes to repeat, because, I guess, they find it too difficult to explain a little bit about quantum mechanics to the public, or maybe because they don't understand it themselves.

Let's play the shell game. A pea is hidden under one of three cups. Now... would you say the pea is rapidly shifting back and forth between the cups? Of course not, nothing at all is changing. It's just that there's a certain probability that the pea is under each one.

It's the same with the vacuum. It's a steady state - nothing at all is changing. The vacuum does not "boil" with virtual particles. It's just that there's a certain probability that a number of virtual particles are present.

Furthermore, energy is conserved, even in quantum mechanics, and for this reason too you can't have virtual particles appearing out of nowhere and disappearing again, even if they do it very quickly!
why is the amount of matter in the universe disproportionate to the amount of antimatter?
That's a different issue. No one knows the answer to that one.
 
Thanks, that's really helped. I've only recently started to become interested in quantum physics, and as of my last question, I see now it was a very question indeed.
 
I think there is a probability of spontaneous emergence of particle-antiparticle pair , but simultaneous occurrence for ALL particles of out body is overwhelmingly small. It's looks like a question of entropy.
 
I am not sure if this belongs in the biology section, but it appears more of a quantum physics question. Mike Wiest, Associate Professor of Neuroscience at Wellesley College in the US. In 2024 he published the results of an experiment on anaesthesia which purported to point to a role of quantum processes in consciousness; here is a popular exposition: https://neurosciencenews.com/quantum-process-consciousness-27624/ As my expertise in neuroscience doesn't reach up to an ant's ear...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
I am reading WHAT IS A QUANTUM FIELD THEORY?" A First Introduction for Mathematicians. The author states (2.4 Finite versus Continuous Models) that the use of continuity causes the infinities in QFT: 'Mathematicians are trained to think of physical space as R3. But our continuous model of physical space as R3 is of course an idealization, both at the scale of the very large and at the scale of the very small. This idealization has proved to be very powerful, but in the case of Quantum...
Back
Top