Matter vs Antimatter: Understanding the Disproportion

  • Thread starter Thread starter GuRuPhysicsGuy
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Antimatter Matter
GuRuPhysicsGuy
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
If virtual particles are popping into and out of existence all the time, why aren'twe? Why aren't the particles that make up everything popping in and out of existence and why is the amount of matter in the universe disproportionate to the amount of antimatter?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
If virtual particles are popping into and out of existence all the time, why aren't we?
Short answer: they aren't.

This is another one of those fairy tales that the popular science media likes to repeat, because, I guess, they find it too difficult to explain a little bit about quantum mechanics to the public, or maybe because they don't understand it themselves.

Let's play the shell game. A pea is hidden under one of three cups. Now... would you say the pea is rapidly shifting back and forth between the cups? Of course not, nothing at all is changing. It's just that there's a certain probability that the pea is under each one.

It's the same with the vacuum. It's a steady state - nothing at all is changing. The vacuum does not "boil" with virtual particles. It's just that there's a certain probability that a number of virtual particles are present.

Furthermore, energy is conserved, even in quantum mechanics, and for this reason too you can't have virtual particles appearing out of nowhere and disappearing again, even if they do it very quickly!
why is the amount of matter in the universe disproportionate to the amount of antimatter?
That's a different issue. No one knows the answer to that one.
 
Thanks, that's really helped. I've only recently started to become interested in quantum physics, and as of my last question, I see now it was a very question indeed.
 
I think there is a probability of spontaneous emergence of particle-antiparticle pair , but simultaneous occurrence for ALL particles of out body is overwhelmingly small. It's looks like a question of entropy.
 
Not an expert in QM. AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is quite different from the classical wave equation. The former is an equation for the dynamics of the state of a (quantum?) system, the latter is an equation for the dynamics of a (classical) degree of freedom. As a matter of fact, Schrödinger's equation is first order in time derivatives, while the classical wave equation is second order. But, AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is a wave equation; only its interpretation makes it non-classical...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
Is it possible, and fruitful, to use certain conceptual and technical tools from effective field theory (coarse-graining/integrating-out, power-counting, matching, RG) to think about the relationship between the fundamental (quantum) and the emergent (classical), both to account for the quasi-autonomy of the classical level and to quantify residual quantum corrections? By “emergent,” I mean the following: after integrating out fast/irrelevant quantum degrees of freedom (high-energy modes...
Back
Top