Max Acceleration: Body Reaches on Ground

  • Context: High School 
  • Thread starter Thread starter mprm86
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Acceleration Maximum
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The maximum acceleration a car can achieve on a flat track, using only its engine and without external assistance, is limited to gravitational acceleration (g), approximately 9.81 m/s². This limitation arises from the friction between the tires and the ground, which is influenced by the normal force and the friction coefficient. While specialized tires and aerodynamic enhancements can increase acceleration beyond this limit, standard street-legal tires typically max out around 1g. High-performance vehicles, such as Top Fuel Dragsters, can achieve accelerations exceeding 4g due to their unique design and tire capabilities.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Newton's laws of motion
  • Knowledge of friction coefficients and their impact on vehicle dynamics
  • Familiarity with vehicle performance metrics, including acceleration and horsepower
  • Basic principles of aerodynamics as they relate to vehicle design
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the physics of friction and its role in vehicle acceleration
  • Explore the design and performance of Top Fuel Dragsters
  • Learn about the effects of aerodynamics on car performance
  • Investigate the mechanics of tire design and their impact on traction
USEFUL FOR

Automotive engineers, racing enthusiasts, physics students, and anyone interested in understanding the limits of vehicle acceleration and performance dynamics.

  • #31
Stingray said:
:confused: The third response is where it was clarified that the question specifically referred to cars.
Pervect was right; the guy's flame-baiting. Let's just ignore him.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #32
I don't even know what flame baiting is. The question although referring to a car, does not refer to a normal car, not only that, but he asks about limits. And, As I stated before, the only limits that a MECHANICAL engine would have, would be due to relativity. Normal cars reach more than one g right now. You should watch racing sometime. Well, Normal if you are speaking about a racecar, which I assume you are.
 
  • #33
memarf1 said:
the only limits that a MECHANICAL engine would have, would be due to relativity.
So once you've made this engine out of neutronium so it won't explode at several million rpm... you're going to fuel it with antimatter to get that much mass reciprocating?

memarf1 said:
You should watch racing sometime.
We've not only watched it; we've done it. And apparently Stingray is still doing it.

And if you really don't know what flame-baiting is, just look back over your last couple of posts for examples thereof. It's aguing (usually impolitely) just for the sake of pissing people off even when you know that you're wrong in hopes that a war will start.
 
  • #34
nemarf1, your posts appear overly argumentative. Ie, like Danger said, long before Einstein even comes into the picture, Newton will tear the engine apart. That makes Relativity far from relevant here. The other posters here were simply trying to constrain the thread to the limits of physical reality.

So that's enough of the bickering, guys...
 
  • #35
Russ, by your definition Relitivity would never play a part. If we ever hope to travel at speeds close to the speed of light we will have to use mechanical engines which will not tear themselves apart. Not only that but in space we will have to find a way to eliminate the heat emmitted by the friction inside the engine or our ship will simply melt.

No, Relativity is the only limit we have to talk about here, if we can use a fusion powered engine as proposed above, for this super racecar.

Conventional means that we use today without using rocket engines are wind limited to answer the original question based on a normal racecar without being confrontational.

However, I still say that Relativity is the only limiting factor if you are asking about a super racecar powered by something we don't fully understand yet.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
800
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
983
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
836
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
4K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
647
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 28 ·
Replies
28
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
5
Views
5K