Maximal Ideals under Canonical Ring Homomorphism: A/I to A

  • Thread starter Thread starter Dragonfall
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Ring
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the properties of a ring homomorphism from a ring A to the quotient ring A/I, specifically examining whether the preimage of maximal ideals under this homomorphism retains the maximality in the original ring A.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification, Assumption checking, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants explore the relationship between maximal ideals in A and A/I, questioning the nature of the homomorphism and the implications of bijections between ideals. There is discussion about the conditions under which such bijections hold and the definitions involved.

Discussion Status

The conversation is ongoing, with participants providing insights and clarifications regarding the nature of the homomorphism and its effects on ideals. Some guidance has been offered regarding the relationship between ideals of A and A/I, but there is no explicit consensus on the original poster's query.

Contextual Notes

There are assumptions about the nature of the ideal I and the rings involved, including considerations of whether I is trivial or the implications of the rings being infinite.

Dragonfall
Messages
1,023
Reaction score
5

Homework Statement


f:A->A/I is a ring homomorphism. Does f^-1 take maximal ideas of A/I to maximal ideals of A?

The Attempt at a Solution



I think it does, since there is a bijection between A and A/I preserving subsets-ordering. But f might not be that bijection.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
There's no bijection between R and R/I unless I is {0} ;)Are you supposed to prove this or do you just want to know?EDIT: Unless of course, R is infinite *blushes*

And even then, it won't always be the case.
 
Last edited:
I mean bijection between ideals of A/I and those of A containing I.
 
Yeah, that's right
 
So how do I use that to show that f^-1 takes maximal ideas of A/I to those of A?
 
Well if you're allowed to use the fact that f induces a bijection between the ideals of A containing I and the ideals of A/I that preserves inclusion, then that should be easy. Think about a maximal ideal [tex]M_{A}[/tex] containing [tex]f^{-1}(N_{A/I})[/tex] where [tex]N_{A/I}[/tex] is maximal in A/I.
 
Do you mean that f *is* a bijection between the ideals of A containing I and the ideas of A/I that preserves inclusion? Not sure what you meant by "induces". Do you mean defining g which acts on the power set of A, and g(x) is the image f(x)?
 
No because f isn't a map on the ideals! It's a map on elements of A onto cosets of I. I guess we were being a little sloppy earlier. You can think of it like that but formally, they are two distinct maps. It's common to abuse notation and write them the same however.
 
Ok, I think I got it. Thanks!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K