Maximize xy when x + y + z = 3

  • Thread starter Thread starter Mr Davis 97
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Optimization
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The problem of maximizing the product ##xy## under the constraints of positive values for ##x, y, z## such that ##x + y + z = 3## and ##x \le y \le z## has a unique solution. The optimal values occur when ##x = y = z = 1##, leading to a maximum product of 1. This conclusion is supported by the transformation of the variables into a convex programming framework, allowing the application of the Karush-Kuhn-Tucker conditions to confirm the uniqueness of the solution. The analysis demonstrates that despite the non-convex nature of the function, the convex region defined by the constraints ensures a single global maximum.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of optimization problems, particularly non-convex optimization
  • Familiarity with convex programming concepts
  • Knowledge of the Karush-Kuhn-Tucker conditions
  • Basic algebra and inequalities involving real numbers
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the principles of convex programming and its applications
  • Learn about the Karush-Kuhn-Tucker conditions in detail
  • Explore geometric programming techniques for optimization
  • Investigate non-convex optimization problems and their solutions
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, optimization specialists, students studying advanced calculus or linear programming, and anyone interested in solving constrained optimization problems.

Mr Davis 97
Messages
1,461
Reaction score
44

Homework Statement


For positive x, y, z where ##x \le y \le z## such that x + y + z = 3, what is the maximum value of ##xy##?

Homework Equations

The Attempt at a Solution


First, before I attempt a solution, isn't it the case that ##x=y=z=1##, since the only partition of 3 into three terms is 1+1+1? I feel like if this would the case the problem would be way too simple, which is why I'm asking.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Only if x,y,z have to be integers. In optimisation problems, one usually assumes they can be any real numbers, unless advised otherwise. So here are three other possibilities:

x=0.1, y=0.2, z=2.7
x=0.5, y=1, z=1.5
x=0.7, y=1.1, z=1.2

The set of allowable points will be a solid polygon.
 
Mr Davis 97 said:

Homework Statement


For positive x, y, z where ##x \le y \le z## such that x + y + z = 3, what is the maximum value of ##xy##?

Homework Equations

The Attempt at a Solution


First, before I attempt a solution, isn't it the case that ##x=y=z=1##, since the only partition of 3 into three terms is 1+1+1? I feel like if this would the case the problem would be way too simple, which is why I'm asking.

You have found the globally optimal solution over the region ##\{x >0,y \geq x,z \geq y, x+y+z=3 \}## but proving that this is the case may be tricky (because you have a non-convex optimzation problem, so in principle could have numerous local maxima). However, a bit of further re-writing shows this to not be the case: there is only one solution, and you have found it.

First, re-write your final constraint as ##x+y+z \leq 3##; it will be satisfied as an equality at the maximum, (because for any point where the inequality is strict, we can move it out a bit to the boundary and keep the other constraints satisfied, while also increasing ##x y##).

So now we want to maximize a non-convex function ##xy## but over a convex region. As is done in so-called Geometric Programming, we can change variables to ##x=e^u, y = e^v, z = e^w##. We want to minimize ##x^{-1} y^{-1}##, so our problem becomes to minimize ##f(u,v) = -u-v##, subject to constraints ##u-v \leq 0,## ## v-w \leq 0## and ##e^u + u^v + e^w \leq 3##. The function ##g(u,v,w) = e^u + u^v + e^w## is strictly convex, so the region ## g(u,v,w) \leq 3## is convex. Altogether, we have a convex programming in ##(u,v,w)##, and so any local constrained minimum (of ##f(u,v)##) is automatically a global constrained minimum. In other words, the solution is unique and can be found from the Karush-Kuhn-Tucker conditions.
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
3K
Replies
17
Views
3K
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
3K