I Maximizing Compound Bow Power: The Role of Longer Limbs Explained

Click For Summary
Longer limbs on a compound bow can contribute to increased power due to enhanced tension and energy storage, but they are not the sole factor. The bow's design must balance limb length with other dimensions to optimize energy transfer to the arrow. Proper material use is crucial; excess weight from components not involved in energy storage can hinder performance. Additionally, the bow string and pulley system must be matched to the arrow for effective energy release. Overall, a well-balanced design is essential for maximizing a compound bow's power.
kingofjong
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
TL;DR
longer limbs equal more power
Hello

If a compound bow has longer limbs will it have more power? Longer limbs means more limbs, hence more tension is building when limbs bend. That tension transfers to the bow string. Is this a true statement. I know there are other factors for making a powerful compound bow. Is long limbs one of the factors for powerful compound bow.

Thanks
Kingofjong
 
Physics news on Phys.org
kingofjong said:
If a compound bow has longer limbs will it have more power?
The length and strength of your arms dictate the length and thickness of the bow, and any compound arrangement.

Energy is stored in the bow by elastic compression and tension. The stored energy must be distributed throughout the bow material, in a way that can be recovered quickly, without failure. Component material not fully involved in storing energy must be carried around as unnecessary extra weight.

The force on the arrow needs to be maximised over the available period of time. The bow string is involved in impedance matching the bow to the arrow. There will be an optimum arrangement of string and pulleys beyond which only very light, or very heavy arrows, will be released efficiently.

If you change one dimension of the bow, you must compensate by changing other dimensions to maintain or increase the available energy stored. You need a balanced and matched design. Length is not everything.
 
Thread 'The rocket equation, one more time'
I already posted a similar thread a while ago, but this time I want to focus exclusively on one single point that is still not clear to me. I just came across this problem again in Modern Classical Mechanics by Helliwell and Sahakian. Their setup is exactly identical to the one that Taylor uses in Classical Mechanics: a rocket has mass m and velocity v at time t. At time ##t+\Delta t## it has (according to the textbooks) velocity ##v + \Delta v## and mass ##m+\Delta m##. Why not ##m -...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
6K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
4K
  • · Replies 75 ·
3
Replies
75
Views
6K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
2K
  • · Replies 39 ·
2
Replies
39
Views
14K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
3K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
2K
Replies
10
Views
4K