Maximizing Free Fall Distance: Solving for Equal Time Intervals

  • Thread starter Thread starter Juliusz
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Fall Free fall
Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
14 replies · 2K views
Juliusz
Messages
13
Reaction score
3

Homework Statement


A body is falling from a height of 720m. Divide this distance into three parts so that the body would overcome all parts in the same time.

P.S (This is translated from a different language)

Homework Equations


x(t)= x0+V0+at2/2
v(t)=V0+at

The Attempt at a Solution


I made an acceleration over time graph, and thought about diving it into three equal parts, and the area would be the velocity. But I can't figure out how to divide it into three equal parts, or if this is the correct way to solve the problem at all.
The graph: https://www.desmos.com/calculator/l9nkar1tqa
 
Physics news on Phys.org
What's the total time it takes to fall? Start with that.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Juliusz
Is this correct? If so, what's next?

x(t)= x0+V0+at2/2
t=√2x/√a
t=12.12

Also, how do I format division as a fraction here? Thanks!
 
You can also think of Change in velocity during these equal intervals of time.
 
Juliusz said:
Is this correct? If so, what's next?

x(t)= x0+V0+at2/2
t=√2x/√a
t=12.12

Also, how do I format division as a fraction here? Thanks!

If you take ##g = 10/s^2## then the time is exactly ##12s##.

In any case, now you have the total to time isn't the next step obvious? Divide the motion into three equal parts, it said.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Juliusz
I looked at the answer, ant it is 80m, 240m, 400m. I can't see how I can figure that out by knowing the total time
 
Juliusz said:
I looked at the answer, ant it is 80m, 240m, 400m. I can't see how I can figure that out by knowing the total time
Divide the total time into thirds (as PeroK told you) and find the position at times t/3 and 2t/3.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Juliusz
t1=12
t2=8
t3=4

x(t)=a*t2/2

x(t1)=10*122/2=720
x(t2)=10*82/2=320
x(t3)=10*42/2=80

I think I did what you two were suggesting, but I still got a bad answer for t2. Maybe I made a wrong assumption somewhere?
 
Last edited:
Juliusz said:
t1=12
t2=8
t34

x(t)=a*t2/2

x(t1)=10*122/2=720
x(t2)=10*82/2=320
x(t3)=10*42/2=80

I think I did what you two were suggesting, but I still got a bad answer for t2. Maybe I made a wrong assumption somewhere?
Think about what those distances mean.
 
PeroK said:
Think about what those distances mean.
They mean the distance fallen by the body after a certain amount of time
 
Juliusz said:
They mean the distance fallen by the body after a certain amount of time
So how far did the object fall between t3 and t2 (for example)?
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Juliusz
Visualize the problem and the path. Re-read the question. You are just applying the formula blindly and thinking that this formula will give me that answer. You are almost there. Then you are not confident of what you are doing; you say, "I did what you told me" still I am not getting answer. Now just think visualize coolly and alone and get the answer.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Juliusz, Doc Al and Vatsal Goyal
Doc Al said:
So how far did the object fall between t3 and t2 (for example)?
I get it now, thanks! The body fell 80 meters in the first 4 seconds, then another 240 meters (which is 320-80) in the following 4 seconds. And then, in the last 4 seconds it fell 400 meters, which is 720-320m. Thanks for the help everyone!
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Let'sthink and PeroK
Juliusz said:
I get it now, thanks! The body fell 80 meters in the first 4 seconds, then another 240 meters (which is 320-80) in the following 4 seconds. And then, in the last 4 seconds it fell 400 meters, which is 720-320m. Thanks for the help everyone!
Good now can you write down a general formula for finding distance traveled between any time t1 and t2, that is for the time interval (t2-t1)? Think it over.