MHB Maximizing Industry Profit w/ Limited Resources

evinda
Gold Member
MHB
Messages
3,741
Reaction score
0
Hello! (Wave)

An industry produces 2 kinds of a product $k_1$ and $k_2$ at its 3 factories $F_1, F_2, F_3$.

At the following matrix we can see the hours that are needed from each factory for the production of one kilogram of $k_1$ and $k_2$.

$\begin{matrix}
& F_1 & F_2 & F_3\\
k_1 & 2 & 3 & 1\\
k_2 & 3 & 2 & 2
\end{matrix}$

The profit per kilogram is $300$ euros for $k_1$ and $250$ for $k_2$.
The factory $F_1$ is able to work till $16$ hours, $F_2$ till $18$ hours, $F_3$ till $10$ hours.
I want to find how many kilograms of each product have to be produced the day so that the profit of the industry is maximized.So do we have to find an objective function with some restrictions or do we use dynamic programming? (Thinking)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
evinda said:
So do we have to find an objective function with some restrictions or do we use dynamic programming? (Thinking)

Hi evinda! (Smile)

We have to find an objective function and some additional restrictions.
And then we have to use linear programming to solve it (the simplex method). (Nerd)
 
I like Serena said:
Hi evinda! (Smile)

We have to find an objective function and some additional restrictions.
And then we have to use linear programming to solve it (the simplex method). (Nerd)

I think that the problem that we get is the following:

$$\max (300 x_1+ 250x_2) \\ 2x_1+3x_2 \leq 16 \\ 3x_1+2x_2 \leq 18 \\ x_1+ 2 x_2 \leq 10$$

Am I right? (Thinking)
 
Yep.
 
I like Serena said:
Yep.

We suppose that $x_1$ represents the kilograms of the product $k_1$ and $x_2$ represents the kilograms of $k_2$, right? (Thinking)

Do I have to explain the relations that we get further? (Thinking)
 
We get that in order to have the maximum possible profit we have to produce $\frac{22}{5}$ kilograms of $k_1$ and $\frac{12}{5}$ of $k_2$, right?
 
Hi all, I've been a roulette player for more than 10 years (although I took time off here and there) and it's only now that I'm trying to understand the physics of the game. Basically my strategy in roulette is to divide the wheel roughly into two halves (let's call them A and B). My theory is that in roulette there will invariably be variance. In other words, if A comes up 5 times in a row, B will be due to come up soon. However I have been proven wrong many times, and I have seen some...
Thread 'Detail of Diagonalization Lemma'
The following is more or less taken from page 6 of C. Smorynski's "Self-Reference and Modal Logic". (Springer, 1985) (I couldn't get raised brackets to indicate codification (Gödel numbering), so I use a box. The overline is assigning a name. The detail I would like clarification on is in the second step in the last line, where we have an m-overlined, and we substitute the expression for m. Are we saying that the name of a coded term is the same as the coded term? Thanks in advance.

Similar threads

Back
Top