Maximizing Metabolism: The Truth About Eating Frequency and Weight Loss

  • Thread starter Thread starter aychamo
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Metabolism
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the relationship between eating frequency and metabolism, particularly in the context of weight loss. Participants explore various theories and personal experiences regarding meal frequency, metabolic rates, and hormonal influences on hunger and satiety.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Debate/contested
  • Conceptual clarification

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants suggest that eating smaller, more frequent meals may help maintain or increase metabolic rate, potentially aiding in weight management.
  • Others argue that constant eating could lead to continuous insulin production, which might stimulate anabolic metabolism and store energy, raising questions about its effectiveness for weight loss.
  • A participant mentions the role of leptin, a hormone that regulates hunger, and questions the feasibility of synthesizing it for weight management.
  • Another participant highlights the complexity of hormonal regulation, noting that introducing hormones like leptin could disrupt the body's natural feedback mechanisms.
  • Some participants express skepticism about the 20-minute delay in the brain signaling fullness, sharing personal experiences that contradict this timeframe.
  • There is a suggestion that the relationship between eating frequency and health may be influenced more by activity levels than by meal frequency alone.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants do not reach a consensus on the effectiveness of frequent eating for weight loss, with multiple competing views and uncertainties expressed throughout the discussion.

Contextual Notes

Participants acknowledge various assumptions and limitations in their reasoning, including the potential variability in individual metabolic responses and the influence of activity levels on eating habits.

aychamo
Messages
375
Reaction score
0
Hey guys;

I've always heard things similar to that instead of eating three meals a day, you should spread the same amount of food over say five meals a day. Eat smaller portions, but more often.

I don't understand why (if) this works. If you keep eating small amounts all day long, you will keep your body producing insulin to lower your blood sugar levels. If you keep producing insulin, you stimulate the anabolic parts of metabolism (such as increased glycogen synthesis, increased protein synthesis, increased glycolysis, increased protein synthesis, and increased fatty acid synthesis.)

So bascially, if you eat all those portions all day, your body will constantly be building up its stores. How can that help you lose weight?

Thank you!
 
Biology news on Phys.org
Hi

Im no expert, but what i think/have heard is that by eating little and often, you maintain/increase your metabolic rate (i think this is the rate at which your body burns energy)

Another way to look at it is, if say you only had one meal a day, your body would react by absorbing all the energy it could, in case it was another x hours before the next meal.

So i think by having more smaller meals, your body will not "worry" about not getting enough nutrition, and so will not feel like it needs to store absolutely everything you eat.

And also, i think more/often will mean a more balanced sugar level, which is supposed to be a good thing.

I find snacking on fruit in between meal, stops you becoming "overly hungry" when the next meal time comes. This helps because i believe it takes say 20 minutes for your body to tell your brain that you are full, so in theory, you could be eating extra food for this "20 mins" which you didnt really need.

another tip is to drink plenty of water, as this does help to make you feel more full when you do eat, and i think the "hunger" cravings sometimes are for fluids.

Like i say, I am not an expert, but i believe this to be correct.

Hope this helps

Si
 
That's cool. I'm not looking to lose weight, I'm in med school biochemistry right now, and was just trying to reason out what I'm learning.

We also learned that white adipose tissue secrets a chemical called Leptin that makes you not feel hunger. I wonder why we can't synthesize that and take it orally or by injection?
 
Leptin huh, well i guess if it can be sold, it will be on the way hehe
 
aychamo said:
We also learned that white adipose tissue secrets a chemical called Leptin that makes you not feel hunger. I wonder why we can't synthesize that and take it orally or by injection?
Because it has effects on neural systems other than just satiety, such as reproduction (the mechanism isn't known yet). As with any hormone, you also have to keep in mind the homeostatic mechanisms involved in its regulation. If you give more of a hormone via injection or pills, etc., you shut down endogenous release due to negative feedback. Leptin has only been fairly recently discovered...perhaps only 10 years ago, which in endocrinology is quite new. There is also a new appetite regulatory hormone just announced as having been discovered, and it has been given the name obestatin. The problem with something that new is that we often find hormones influence many systems in the body, not just the one system being studied that led to its discovery.
 
Moonbear said:
Because it has effects on neural systems other than just satiety, such as reproduction (the mechanism isn't known yet). As with any hormone, you also have to keep in mind the homeostatic mechanisms involved in its regulation. If you give more of a hormone via injection or pills, etc., you shut down endogenous release due to negative feedback. Leptin has only been fairly recently discovered...perhaps only 10 years ago, which in endocrinology is quite new. There is also a new appetite regulatory hormone just announced as having been discovered, and it has been given the name obestatin. The problem with something that new is that we often find hormones influence many systems in the body, not just the one system being studied that led to its discovery.

I was going to ask about those hormones (leptin, obestatin) - are they fat or water soluble?
 
So what about that OP? ;-)
 
aychamo said:
Hey guys;
I've always heard things similar to that instead of eating three meals a day, you should spread the same amount of food over say five meals a day. Eat smaller portions, but more often.
I don't understand why (if) this works. If you keep eating small amounts all day long, you will keep your body producing insulin to lower your blood sugar levels. If you keep producing insulin, you stimulate the anabolic parts of metabolism (such as increased glycogen synthesis, increased protein synthesis, increased glycolysis, increased protein synthesis, and increased fatty acid synthesis.)
So bascially, if you eat all those portions all day, your body will constantly be building up its stores. How can that help you lose weight?
I must emphasize that I know nothing.

I'm not sure whether eating often is a cause or effect of being healthy. The only people I know who eat like this are very active people. One is a weight lifter, one plays hockey, and one is just a twichy guy who likes stimulants. I'm a skinny guy who eats maybe once every 7 hours. You'll just as easily find a fat guy who eats every 7 hours.
It probably has more to do with activity than anything else.
 
I find snacking on fruit in between meal, stops you becoming "overly hungry" when the next meal time comes. This helps because i believe it takes say 20 minutes for your body to tell your brain that you are full, so in theory, you could be eating extra food for this "20 mins" which you didnt really need.

i highly doubt it would take that long! wow 20 minutes? but i usually scarf down my dinner in about 5 minutes when i have tons to homework to finish and i feel almost full immediately afterwards. (before i was starving too) so it couldn't take 20 minutes right?
 
  • #10
adjkgh said:
i highly doubt it would take that long! wow 20 minutes? but i usually scarf down my dinner in about 5 minutes when i have tons to homework to finish and i feel almost full immediately afterwards. (before i was starving too) so it couldn't take 20 minutes right?

Like i said, i am not an expert, but it is something i have heard a few times from different people. Perhaps it is incorrect, or maybe the time is shorter, i really couldn't say.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
7K
  • Poll Poll
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
6K
Replies
16
Views
6K
Replies
6
Views
11K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
10K
  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
27K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
40K
  • · Replies 27 ·
Replies
27
Views
5K