Maximizing the height of a bullet in cylindrical coordinates

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on maximizing the height of a bullet fired from a gun in cylindrical coordinates, specifically analyzing the equation z = (v0² / 2g) - (gρ² / 2v0²). Participants emphasize the application of Newton's laws to derive the functions z(t) and ρ(t). The key challenge is determining the net force acting in the horizontal direction (ρ) and correctly differentiating z(ρ) to maximize the 3D distance from the launch point. The conversation highlights the importance of understanding projectile motion in a cylindrical coordinate system.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Newton's laws of motion
  • Familiarity with cylindrical coordinates
  • Knowledge of projectile motion principles
  • Ability to differentiate functions in calculus
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of projectile motion equations in cylindrical coordinates
  • Learn how to apply Newton's laws to non-linear motion
  • Research methods for maximizing functions using calculus
  • Explore the concept of forces in different coordinate systems
USEFUL FOR

Students studying classical mechanics, physics educators, and anyone interested in advanced projectile motion analysis in cylindrical coordinates.

Qbit42
Messages
45
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A gun can fire shells in any direction with the same speed v0. Ignoring air resistance and using cylindrical polar coordinates with the gun at the origin and z measure vertically up, show that the gun can hit any object inside the surface

z = \frac{v_{0}^{2}}{2g} - \frac{g\rho^{2}}{2v_{0}^{2}}


Homework Equations



\phi is fixed so any derivative terms can be neglected, making Newtons equations:

F_{\rho} = m\frac{d^{2}\rho}{dt^{2}}

F_{z} = m\frac{d^{2}z}{dt^{2}}


The Attempt at a Solution



I know how I should tackle this problem, but I can't get started. I want to use Newton's laws to solve for z(t) and \rho(t). Differentiate z(t) to solve for max height at t_{final}. Then solve \rho(t_{final}) for t_{final}(\rho) and use that to find z(\rho).

I have no idea how to solve Newtons equations in this case, it seems like F_{z} = F_{g} and I have no idea what expression to use for F _{\rho}

Edit: I do not know why my subscripts are being interpreted as superscripts but I can't get it to stop.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Without getting into too much detail, the subscript/superscript thing is because of a feature of the browser layout. Don't mix LaTeX code with regular letters; it's better to put the entire equation or expression in LaTeX.

F_\rho = m\frac{\mathrm{d}^2\rho}{\mathrm{d}t^2}

and z(t) etc.

Anyway: you've correctly identified that the force in the z (vertical) direction is the force of gravity. What is the net force acting in the ρ (horizontal) direction? This part of the problem is simple projectile motion, except that the coordinates are labeled ρ and z instead of x and y as you might be used to.

Once you've found the functions z(t) and \rho(t), you will need to combine them to find z(\rho), and then differentiate - but not to find the max height. You should instead be looking at the direct 3D distance between the projectile and the launch point.
 
Thanks for the clarification on the superscript problem. I honestly have no idea what force would be acting on the bullet in the horizontal direction, its been a long time since I've done any classical mechanics and I always hated it (still do).

As to the differentiation part, If I have z(\rho) then I guess I'd want to differentiate with respect to \rho or \phi to maximize 3D distance.

Edit: Do I have to split the initial velocity into components based on angle between \rho and z? Like V_{oz} = V_{0}Sin(\theta) and V_{o\rho} = V_{0}Cos(\theta). Although I don't see how that would help since I need an expression for the time derivative of V_{0} and those are just constants.
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
3K
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 32 ·
2
Replies
32
Views
4K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 36 ·
2
Replies
36
Views
6K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
6K
Replies
4
Views
4K