Maximum Angle for 2D Collision: Does θmax Exist if m1 > m2?

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem involves an elastic collision between two masses, m1 and m2, where m1 is initially in motion and m2 is at rest. The goal is to determine the maximum deflection angle θ of mass m1 after the collision, particularly examining the implications of the mass ratio when m1 is greater than m2.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the derivation of the maximum angle θmax and question the validity of the provided answer, particularly in relation to the mass ratio of m1 and m2. Some participants suggest that the original problem may have assumptions that affect the outcome.

Discussion Status

There is an ongoing examination of the mathematical derivations and assumptions made regarding the collision. Some participants have offered alternative perspectives on the maximum angle and questioned the correctness of the initial answer. The discussion is active, with various interpretations being explored.

Contextual Notes

Participants note potential confusion arising from the mass ratio and its implications on the maximum angle, particularly when considering cases where m1 is less than or greater than m2. There is also mention of the need for clearer notation and visual aids to enhance understanding.

Luca 123
Messages
21
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A mass m1, with initial velocity u, collides elastically with mass m2, which is initially at rest. After collision, m1 deflects by angle θ. Find the maximum value of θ. The answer given is θmax=acos(sqrt(1-(m1/m2)^2)). Does this mean that the maximum angle cannot exist if m1>m2?

Homework Equations


Let m2 deflect by angle α from the initial direction of m1, and v1, v2 be the velocity of m1, m2 respectively after collision. Then
1.(m1)(u)= (m1)(v1)(cosθ)+(m2)(v2)(cosα)
2. (m1)(v1)(sinθ)=(m2)(v2)(sinα)
3. (m1)(u)^2=(m1)(v1)^2 + (m2)(v2)^2

The Attempt at a Solution


I got θmax =acos(sqrt(1-(m2/m1)^2)) instead.
By 1. and 2.
[(m1)(u)-(m1)(v1)(cosθ)]^2 +[(m1)(v1)(sinθ)]^2 = [(m2)(v2)(cosα)]^2 +[(m1)(v1)(sinα)]^2
Hence
(m1u)^2 +(m1v1)^2 - 2(m1)^2(v1u cosθ)^2 = (m2v2)^2
By 3.
(m2v2)^2 = (m2m1)(u^2-v1^2)
Thus
m1(u^2) +m1(v1^2) - 2m1(v1u cosθ)^2 = (m2)(u^2-v1^2)
Dividing by v1^2 , we get:
(m1-m2)(u/v1)^2 -(2m1cosθ)(u/v1)+(m1+m2)=0
Hence the equation (m1-m2)x^2-(2m1cosθ)x+(m1+m2)=0 has a solution. Since it has a solution, we must have b^2-4ac≥0. Thus:
(2m1cosθ)^2 ≥4(m1-m2)(m2+m1)
And hence
cosθ≥sqrt(1-(m2/m1)^2). Since the maximum θ of means the minimum of cosθ, θmax =acos(sqrt(1-(m2/m1)^2)).
What went wrong?
[/B]
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I picture would help a lot, as well as distinguishing between vectors and scalars in your notation.
 
ΘΘΘΘ
Luca 123 said:

Homework Statement


A mass m1, with initial velocity u, collides elastically with mass m2, which is initially at rest. After collision, m1 deflects by angle θ. Find the maximum value of θ. The answer given is θmax=acos(sqrt(1-(m1/m2)^2)). Does this mean that the maximum angle cannot exist if m1>m2?
A moment's thought shows that the given answer cannot be right. By inspection, if m1 < m2 then any angle at all up to 180 degrees is attainable. Like bouncing a ping pong ball from a basketball.

In addition, both the given solution and your solution could be dramatically simplified. Start by taking the cosine of both sides.

cos θmax = sqrt(1-(m1/m2)2)

Square both sides

cos2 θmax = 1 - (m1/m2)2

Apply a simple trig identity

sin2 θmax = m1/m22

Take the square root

sin θmax = m1/m2
 
jbriggs444 said:
A moment's thought shows that the given answer cannot be right. By inspection, if m1 < m2 then any angle at all up to 180 degrees is attainable. Like bouncing a ping pong ball from a basketball.
I suspect that the original problem either stated or assumed m1>m2. It is then clear that m1 and m2 are swapped in the given answer.
Luca, I agree with your answer for the case where m1>m2, but you may still be puzzled by the result it gives when m1<=m2. Consider the inequality you had just before "And hence". What do you get with m1<m2 in there?
 

Similar threads

Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
16
Views
5K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
7K
Replies
10
Views
6K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K