Maximum ##d_p(t_e)## value and its meaning

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Arman777
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Maximum Value
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on the maximum value of proper distance, denoted as ##d_p(t_e)##, in cosmological models and its implications. It highlights that for a measured redshift value of ##z = 0.1##, the corresponding proper distance is ##d_p(t_e) = 0.1## Hubble distance. The conversation clarifies that signals from different redshift values, such as ##z = 50##, can exhibit the same proper distance at emission due to the universe's expansion dynamics. This phenomenon occurs because the expansion rate of the universe affects the proper distance over time, leading to signals from different epochs converging at the same distance.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of cosmological redshift (z)
  • Familiarity with proper distance in cosmology
  • Knowledge of Hubble's Law and Hubble distance
  • Basic concepts of cosmic expansion and its effects
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the implications of redshift in cosmology
  • Study the relationship between proper distance and comoving coordinates
  • Learn about the dynamics of cosmic expansion and its impact on light signals
  • Explore graphical representations of cosmological models and their interpretations
USEFUL FOR

Astronomers, cosmologists, and physics students interested in understanding the complexities of cosmic distances and the implications of redshift in observational astronomy.

Arman777
Insights Author
Gold Member
Messages
2,163
Reaction score
191
In cosmological models the relationship between proper distance to a galaxy at the emission and absorption times can be written as ##d_p(t_e)(1 + z) = d_p(t_e)##
1571240571373.png
In this case in most cosmological models we get a maximum value for the ##d_p(t_e)##. This maximum value can be also seen from the graph. The problem is that I did not understand the "physical meaning" of the graph.

Let me describe what I understand. We know that the measurable quantity is the ##z##. So let's suppose we measured value of ##z = 0.1## and we can see that this corresponds to ##d_p(t_e) = 0.1## Hubble distance. At the same time, we measured another source which has a ##z=50##. From the graph, it seems that they have the same proper distance for ##t = t_e## but corresponding different ##z## values. How can this be possible? Thanks
 
Space news on Phys.org
The universe is initially expanding so fast that the proper distance between the signal from z = 50 and the observer starts out increasing. As the universe’s expansion slows down, the signal will start catching up and at some point have the same proper distance to the observer as it started out with. This occurs at z=0.1 in your example. A signal sent at that time will have been sent from the same proper distance at emission.

Note that the emission times are different so the same proper distance at emission for the two signals correspond to different comoving coordinates.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Arman777
So the photon sended from ##50c/H## cannot reach the observer due to the expansion of the universe but later on when universe slows down the photon catches up the same proper distance at ##0.1c/H_0## ?
Orodruin said:
Note that the emission times are different so the same proper distance at emission for the two signals correspond to different comoving coordinates.
I see.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
5K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 134 ·
5
Replies
134
Views
12K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
4K
  • · Replies 33 ·
2
Replies
33
Views
4K