High School Maximum efficiency of a dehumidifier

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the efficiency of wind-powered dehumidifiers, particularly critiqued by the YouTuber Thunderf00t. He incorrectly asserts that the energy required for dehumidification is solely the evaporation heat of water, approximately 2000 kJ/kg. The conversation reveals that to condense water vapor from the air, significant energy must be dissipated, and the ground temperature often fails to reach the necessary dew point for effective operation. A viable alternative proposed involves integrating a refrigerator to facilitate internal dehumidification, thereby reducing energy requirements.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of thermodynamics, specifically enthalpy of evaporation
  • Knowledge of dew point and relative humidity concepts
  • Familiarity with heat exchange principles and ideal heat engines
  • Basic principles of refrigeration systems
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the thermodynamic principles of condensation and evaporation
  • Learn about the design and operation of heat exchangers
  • Explore refrigeration cycle mechanics and their application in dehumidifiers
  • Investigate alternative energy sources for dehumidification systems
USEFUL FOR

Engineers, HVAC professionals, and anyone involved in designing or optimizing dehumidification systems, particularly in challenging climates.

SlowThinker
Messages
475
Reaction score
65
There's a youtube channel where someone nicknamed Thunderf00t is making fun of a water source that is supposed to be a wind-powered dehumidifier. He makes some arguments that don't look entirely valid.

He argues that the energy needed is the evaporation heat of water, or some 2000 kJ/kg. In this video he says the energy is retrieved and needs to be dissipated, in another video he says this energy has to be supplied. Clearly he's somewhat confused, and so am I.

On the one hand, energy should be gained by turning vater vapor into liquid. On the other hand, water evaporates spontaneously, so putting an ideal dehumidifier into a closed loop would create a perpetuum mobile of the 2nd kind.

So I was wondering, how much energy is REALLY needed to take water vapor out of the air, using an ideal heat engine, ideal heat exchangers to pre-cool the input air, etc.? Should venting be accounted for?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
To condense water out of the air you have to dissipate energy and you need to cool the air down to the dew point. To produce the 37 litres of water a day, you need to remove about 1 kW of heat, using only conduction to the ground, and only using the temperature difference between the ground and the dew point.
That's only the enthalpy of evaporation, the air itself needs to be cooled as well.
In most places, the ground won't be cold enough to cool any air to the dew point for half of the year.
If the air is dry, the dew point will be lower and this will make it even harder to produce water. Look at the relative humidity in New Mexico (9:30 in the video). The device will never work, because the ground will never be as cold as the dew point.
 
Yes this device won't work, but another could. It can have a refrigerator inside. Dehumidification would happen inside. Outgoing air would cool the incoming air, so that very little actual power would be needed.
Or is this the answer? You have to supply energy and have to generate heat? I was hoping there could be a way to use the energy gained from condensation to power the device.
Even then, should not $$\eta=\frac{T_{air}-T_{dew}}{T_{dew}}$$ play some role in the result? After all, if the air temperature is at dew point, it should be somewhat easier to extract water out of it, than if the air is very hot.
 
I do not have a good working knowledge of physics yet. I tried to piece this together but after researching this, I couldn’t figure out the correct laws of physics to combine to develop a formula to answer this question. Ex. 1 - A moving object impacts a static object at a constant velocity. Ex. 2 - A moving object impacts a static object at the same velocity but is accelerating at the moment of impact. Assuming the mass of the objects is the same and the velocity at the moment of impact...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 35 ·
2
Replies
35
Views
2K
Replies
10
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 30 ·
2
Replies
30
Views
4K
Replies
9
Views
8K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
16K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
4K
Replies
5
Views
5K
Replies
3
Views
4K