Maximum separation between blocks on spring

Click For Summary
The discussion focuses on determining the maximum and minimum separation between two blocks connected by a spring on a frictionless table. The conservation of energy principle is applied, leading to the equation (1/2)mvmax^2 = (1/2)kx^2, which is used to find the extension of the spring, x. However, it is noted that the maximum separation should not depend on vmax, prompting a reevaluation of the energy equation. Clarifications are sought regarding the definition of vmax in the context of two blocks and the fixed position of the spring's center. The conversation highlights the complexity of energy distribution between the blocks and the spring.
henry3369
Messages
194
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Two blocks, each of mass m, are connected on a frictionless horizontal table by a spring of force constant k and equilibrium length L.

Find the maximum and minimum separation between the two blocks in terms of their maximum speed, vmax, relative to the table. (The two blocks always move in opposite directions as they oscillate back and forth about a fixed position.)

Homework Equations


Conservation of energy

The Attempt at a Solution


Ki + Ui = Kf + Uf
Ki = Uf
(1/2)mvmax2 = (1/2)kx2
Solve for x and the (1/2) cancel.
So:
x = sqrt(mvmax/k)
This gives the amount the string has stretched, so the distance between the blocks would be x + L which would result in:
Max Seperation = sqrt(mvmax/k) + L.
When I type in the solution I get a message that his is incorrect because the maximum separation does not depend on vmax.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Re-check the step (1/2)mvmax2 = (1/2)kx2, So: x = sqrt(mvmax/k)

For example with a dimension check.

And: what exactly is vmax if there are two blocks ? Is the centre of the spring fixed to the table ? Don't you have two half springs that way ?
 
henry3369 said:
(1/2)mvmax2 = (1/2)kx2
In addition to BvU's comments, there are two blocks to store KE but only one spring to store PE.
 
The book claims the answer is that all the magnitudes are the same because "the gravitational force on the penguin is the same". I'm having trouble understanding this. I thought the buoyant force was equal to the weight of the fluid displaced. Weight depends on mass which depends on density. Therefore, due to the differing densities the buoyant force will be different in each case? Is this incorrect?

Similar threads

Replies
6
Views
3K
Replies
16
Views
3K
Replies
8
Views
6K
Replies
29
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
17
Views
2K
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 33 ·
2
Replies
33
Views
2K