Maxwell equations and wave equation in a medium

Click For Summary
The discussion focuses on deriving the appropriate Maxwell equations and the damped wave equation for an isotropic medium with constant conductivity and no free charge. The relevant Maxwell equations are presented, emphasizing the inclusion of conductivity in the curl of the magnetic field. Participants express confusion regarding assumptions about the divergence and curl of electric and magnetic fields in this context. The derivation of the wave equation is suggested to start with sinusoidal plane wave assumptions, leading to a partial differential equation for the electric field. Concerns are raised about the adequacy of the problem statement, particularly regarding the lack of information about material properties like permittivity and permeability.
ModusPwnd
Messages
1,255
Reaction score
119

Homework Statement



Consider an isotropic medium with constant conductivity \sigma. There is no free charge present, that is, \rho = 0.

a)What are the appropriate Maxwell equations for this medium?

b)Derive the damped wave equation for the electric field in the medium. Assume Ohm's law is of the form \vec{J}=\sigma\vec{E}.


Homework Equations



Maxwell equations and the curl


The Attempt at a Solution



a)
Maxwell equaitons with \rho_f=0 and \vec{J}=\frac{\vec{E}}{\rho}.

<br /> \nabla \cdot \vec{D} = 0<br /> <br />
<br /> <br /> \nabla \times \vec{E} = - \frac{\partial \vec{B}}{\partial t}<br />
<br /> \nabla \cdot \vec{B} = 0<br />
<br /> \nabla \times \vec{H} = \sigma \vec{E} + \epsilon_0 \mu_0 \frac{\partial \vec{D}}{\partial t}<br />

Its simply a matter of putting a \sigma \vec{E} in place of the displacement current \vec{J} right? hmmm...

b)
Here I am a little confused. I take the curl of the curl of \vec{E},

\nabla \times (\nabla \times \vec{E}) = \nabla(\nabla \cdot \vec{E}) - \nabla^2 \vec{E} = -\nabla^2 \vec{E} = \nabla \times (-\frac{\partial \vec{B}}{\partial t}) = -\frac{\partial}{\partial t} (\nabla \times \vec{B})

Now here I am not sure if I am correct in assuming that \nabla \cdot \vec{E} = 0 and I'm not sure what \nabla \times \vec{B} in this case, since its not in fee space...


Any ideas?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
First thing you do is assume sinusoids. It's pretty near impossible otherwise. So start with the equations for E and H assuming a sinusoidal plane wave. Use the exponetial form E = E0exp(jwt) and H = H0exp(jwt) if you're an engineer or substitute i for j if you're a physicist. :-)

Wind up eliminating H, and get a partial differential equation for E. Solve it.
 
Im not trying to solve the wave equation, I am trying to derive it.
 
The fourth equation is correctly \nabla \times \vec{H} = \sigma \vec{E} +\frac{\partial \vec{D}}{\partial t}

and use also the "material equations" \vec{D}=\epsilon \vec{E}, \vec{B}=\mu\vec{H}

ehild
 
Can I get \mu and \epsilon from the conductivity I am given?
 
No, they are also characteristics of the medium.

ehild
 
bleh, so the question does not provide enough for an answer? My profs. really suck at writing questions, this is not the first time this has happened...
 
You have the appropriate Maxwell equations, and can write the damped wave equation replacing B=μH and D=εE. ε and μ are constants.

ehild
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 32 ·
2
Replies
32
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
3K
Replies
7
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
2K