Maxwell's equations in curved spacetime.

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

Maxwell's equations in curved spacetime can be expressed in two equivalent forms: \nabla^a F_{ab} = -4\pi j_b and d*F = 4\pi*j, with F representing a two-form and j a one-form. The discussion focuses on demonstrating the equivalence of these equations, particularly the first from each set. The user encountered difficulties while attempting to solve this problem using local coordinates and orthonormal frames, specifically regarding the complexity introduced by the metric's determinant and the Christoffel symbols. The problem is sourced from chapter 4 of Wald's text on General Relativity.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Maxwell's equations in the context of General Relativity
  • Familiarity with differential geometry concepts, including tensors and forms
  • Knowledge of the Hodge star operator and its applications
  • Proficiency in using Christoffel symbols and their role in curved spacetime
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of Maxwell's equations in curved spacetime using Wald's General Relativity text
  • Learn about the properties of antisymmetric tensor fields and their divergence
  • Explore the use of local coordinates and orthonormal frames in tensor calculus
  • Investigate the relationship between the Hodge star operator and differential forms
USEFUL FOR

Students and researchers in theoretical physics, particularly those focusing on General Relativity and electromagnetism in curved spacetime. This discussion is also beneficial for anyone tackling advanced problems in differential geometry and tensor analysis.

eok20
Messages
198
Reaction score
0
Maxwell's equations in curved spacetime can be written as
\nabla^a F_{ab} = -4\pi j_b, \nabla_{[a} F_{bc] = 0 or as d*F = 4\pi*j, dF = 0, where F is a two-form, j is a one-form and * is the Hodge star. How do you show that these two sets of equations are equivalent (basically, that the first from each set are equivalent since I see how the second ones are equivalent)? I tried working it out in local coordinates but it got really messy e.g. derivatives of the determinant of the metric and I was unable to get anywhere. I also tried to work it out in terms of an orthonormal frame (tetrad) but that didn't work since I don't know if the Christoffel symbols for the connection have a nice form in that basis.

Any help would GREATLY be appreciated.

Note this is problem 2 in chapter 4 of Wald's text.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
eok20 said:
Any help would GREATLY be appreciated.

Note this is problem 2 in chapter 4 of Wald's text.

Are you done with problem 1? Completely? Sure?
 
arkajad said:
Are you done with problem 1? Completely? Sure?

Yes, I've done problem 1 (showing that \nabla^b j_b = 0) as well as problem 2a (showing that ** = +- 1). I am confident in both of my solutions to these-- does one of these help?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
1K
  • Sticky
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
10K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K