Maybe stupid question - zero positive or negative ?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the mathematical proposition that among any three real numbers (a, b, c), at least two must share the same sign. Participants concluded that this statement is false, particularly when considering the inclusion of zero, which is neither positive nor negative. Examples provided include (0, 0, 0) and (-1, 0, 1), illustrating scenarios where not all numbers share a sign. The consensus is that zero's unique status as "its own sign" invalidates the original proposition.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of real numbers and their properties
  • Basic knowledge of mathematical logic
  • Familiarity with concepts of positive and negative numbers
  • Ability to analyze mathematical propositions
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of zero in real number theory
  • Explore mathematical logic and proof techniques
  • Learn about sign functions and their applications
  • Investigate counterexamples in mathematical propositions
USEFUL FOR

Mathematics students, educators, and anyone interested in understanding the properties of real numbers and logical reasoning in mathematical proofs.

JPC
Messages
204
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement



Hi
I have to say true or false, and then demonstrate my answer
"if taking any 3 Real numbers (a, b, c), we have at least 2 of the same sign"

For me its true, i was thinking of creating a triplet (x, y, z), where
x=1 if "a" positive, x=0 if "a" negative, same for y, and z
and show that with the all the (x, y, z) possibilities, you had always 2 of the same sign

But then, i realized, what if one of the reals a, b, c is equal to 0 ?
like if (a, b, c) = (0, 0, 0)

Is zero considered positive or negative, or both ?

If so, i would have to add another value to the reals of the (x, y, z) triplet , 2, which i can then take as positive when i need or as negative when i need
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Zero is neither positiive nor negative.
Any real number that is positive is greater than zero, and any negative real number is less than zero.
 
ok thank you
then i must reply false to the proposition "if taking any 3 Real numbers (a, b, c), we have at least 2 of the same sign", because with (0, 0, 0) for example , we have none of the same sign
 
JPC said:
ok thank you
then i must reply false to the proposition "if taking any 3 Real numbers (a, b, c), we have at least 2 of the same sign", because with (0, 0, 0) for example , we have none of the same sign
Right. Another example is (1, 0, -1).
 
ok, thank you, you helped me save time not doing a long and incorrect maths demonstration :)
 
JPC said:
ok thank you
then i must reply false to the proposition "if taking any 3 Real numbers (a, b, c), we have at least 2 of the same sign", because with (0, 0, 0) for example , we have none of the same sign

No. 0 is neither positive nor negative but is "its own sign". A better example is (-1, 0, 1).
 
Last edited by a moderator:
0 is non-negative.
 
JG89 said:
0 is non-negative.
Which does not answer the question (which had already been answered). 0 is also non-positive.
 
As others have already said, 0 is neither. 0 is basically the line between positive and negative.
:)
 

Similar threads

Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
Replies
17
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
3K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K
Replies
5
Views
2K