MCNP: Integral flux crossing the spherical surface of a spherical cap

AI Thread Summary
Surface tallies in particle transport simulations can be configured to measure scalar flux through defined surfaces. The suggested setup involves using F1:n 110 with FS1 10, which will provide integrated flux values across a specified sphere divided by surface 10. This configuration allows for the differentiation of flux in regions based on their z-coordinates. When a neutron crosses from one cell to another and scatters, the scalar flux is cumulative, meaning it adds up rather than cancelling out. Understanding these principles is crucial for accurate flux measurement in simulations.
xisco
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
TL;DR Summary
I want to calculate the integral flux crossing the spherical surface of a spherical cap, which I have defined using a spherical surface and a plane. What tally should I use?
c *************** BLOCK 2: SURFACE CARDS **************
10 PZ 100
110 SO 110
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
c ---- TALLIES-------------------------------------
F1:n 10
 
I'm not that familiar with surface tallies, so I've checked a few things in the manual. If what you want is an integral of the *scalar* flux in particles (per source particle) then what I think you want is,
Code:
F1:n 110
FS1 10
So that is a tally through the sphere, with the sphere split by surface 10. That should give two values, the integrated flux through the sphere in the region where Z is larger than 100, since the sense is positive in the FS card, and all other flux. All other flux in this simple example is the sphere with Z<100. If you want it the other way around use -10 instead.
 
Thanks for your reply. Maybe I didn't quite understand what the question was.
 
If you have two cells A and B, and a neutron crosses the surface from A to B the flux is now 1 neutron. Say this neutron scatters from something in B, back to A. The scalar flux, as I understand it, is now 2 neutrons. They don't cancel, they don't vector sum, they add like simple scalars. It's the usual meaning of flux, I'm sorry if I made it sound weird. Does that help?
 
Hello everyone, I am currently working on a burnup calculation for a fuel assembly with repeated geometric structures using MCNP6. I have defined two materials (Material 1 and Material 2) which are actually the same material but located in different positions. However, after running the calculation with the BURN card, I am encountering an issue where all burnup information(power fraction(Initial input is 1,but output file is 0), burnup, mass, etc.) for Material 2 is zero, while Material 1...
Hi everyone, I'm a complete beginner with MCNP and trying to learn how to perform burnup calculations. Right now, I'm feeling a bit lost and not sure where to start. I found the OECD-NEA Burnup Credit Calculational Criticality Benchmark (Phase I-B) and was wondering if anyone has worked through this specific benchmark using MCNP6? If so, would you be willing to share your MCNP input file for it? Seeing an actual working example would be incredibly helpful for my learning. I'd be really...
Back
Top