MCNP6 Reproduction of 40 MeV D - Li Target Experiment

  • Thread starter Thread starter zhaozq
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
The experiment replicates the neutron emission spectra of the Li(d,xn) reaction using a 40 MeV deuteron beam on lithium targets of varying thickness. Despite following the methodology, the calculated results differ significantly from expected outcomes, exceeding a discrepancy of 100 times. The discussion raises concerns about potential errors in the settings or calculations within the MCNP6 simulation. It is noted that the beam current intensity used may differ from that reported in the original study, although this may not directly impact the results. Clarification on the conversion of output data to match the original paper's units is also requested for further analysis.
zhaozq
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
TL;DR Summary
MCNP6 Reproduction of 40 MeV D - Li Target Experiment ?
I reproduced the experiment published by M. Hagiwara et al. using MCNP6. This experiment measures the neutron emission spectra of the Li(d,xn) reaction when 40 MeV deuterons interact with thick and thin lithium targets.The lithium target in the experiment is a cylinder with a diameter of 30 mm, and the thickness of the thick target is 21.4 mm. The source used in the experiment is a 40 MeV deuteron beam with a beam current intensity of 1 μA.The experiment refers to this website: https://nds.iaea.org/exfor/servlet/X4sGetSubent?plus=1&sub=E1986.002 . However, the data I calculated always differs from the expected results by more than 100 times. What could be the reason for this? Have I made mistakes in some of the settings?
Code:
1   0    -1 #2   imp:n,D=1
2   1  -0.534  7 -8 -9   imp:n,D=1
4   0   1   imp:n,D=0
c
c

c
1    so   100
c
7    pz   0
8    pz   2.14
9    cz   1.5
c
c

c
MODE      n d
SDEF      ERG=40  PAR=31 POS=0 0 -40 EFF=1e-2
          WGT=6.242197253e+12
          AXS=0 0 1  rad=d1  ara=7.068583471
          VEC=0 0 1  DIR=1 cel=1
c
si1     0  1.5
SP1     -21 1
c
c --------------------------------------------------
m1      3006.32o  0.075
        3007.32o  0.925
        nlib=32c
c --------------------------------------------------
c
f1:n     8
*c1      110 90 60 45 30 20 15 10 0
e1       1 39i 5 49i 55
c
C f2:n     8
C *c2      110 90 60 45 30 20 15 10 0
C e2       1 39i 5 49i 55
C
f11:n     8
f12:n     8
print     20  30  32  40 50  60  126  198
LOST     1e+1  1e+1
NPS      1e+7
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
Welcome to Physics Forums @zhaozq,

Please show us what the result of the program is, how you are converting that to the units in the paper and what values in the paper it is supposed to match.

The beam current looks to be lower than 1uA in the paper, but I'm not sure that solves the problem. The output of MCNP is independent of intensity and the conclusions of the paper should also be independent of intensity.
 
Hello everyone, I am currently working on a burnup calculation for a fuel assembly with repeated geometric structures using MCNP6. I have defined two materials (Material 1 and Material 2) which are actually the same material but located in different positions. However, after running the calculation with the BURN card, I am encountering an issue where all burnup information(power fraction(Initial input is 1,but output file is 0), burnup, mass, etc.) for Material 2 is zero, while Material 1...
Hi everyone, I'm a complete beginner with MCNP and trying to learn how to perform burnup calculations. Right now, I'm feeling a bit lost and not sure where to start. I found the OECD-NEA Burnup Credit Calculational Criticality Benchmark (Phase I-B) and was wondering if anyone has worked through this specific benchmark using MCNP6? If so, would you be willing to share your MCNP input file for it? Seeing an actual working example would be incredibly helpful for my learning. I'd be really...
Back
Top