ME vs. MET: Which Path is Better for a Career in Weapon Design?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers around the differences between Mechanical Engineering (ME) and Mechanical Engineering Technology (MET) degrees, particularly in the context of pursuing a career in weapon design. Participants explore the implications of each path regarding job roles, responsibilities, and career advancement opportunities.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested
  • Technical explanation
  • Exploratory

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants suggest that an ME degree is necessary for those who want to design products from scratch, while an MET degree is more suited for roles focused on drafting and technical support.
  • Others argue that MET graduates are often viewed as technicians rather than engineers, which may limit their career advancement and salary potential.
  • A participant notes that the work environment for technicians is results-based, contrasting with the accountability-based environment of engineers who focus on problem-solving and design integrity.
  • One participant shares their experience of job satisfaction as a technician, highlighting the rewarding aspects of their role despite the perceived limitations.
  • Another participant expresses concern about potentially wasting time in the MET program and fears about transitioning to ME, citing uncertainty about their ability to succeed in the more rigorous curriculum.
  • There are discussions about the potential for promotions and career growth for MET graduates, with some questioning whether an MET degree can lead to long-term benefits.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express a range of opinions regarding the value and implications of ME versus MET degrees. There is no consensus on which path is definitively better for a career in weapon design, as differing perspectives on job roles and career trajectories are presented.

Contextual Notes

Participants mention various personal experiences and institutional contexts, including the challenges of transitioning between programs and the differing perceptions of technicians versus engineers in the workplace.

  • #31
This has gotten too personal so I'm locking the thread, but there are a couple of key points I want to reiterate:
Herr-Kuhn said:
I never said the two were the same, what I did say is that many METs end up getting the same jobs as MEs do. How old are you and what is your industry experience? I'm 40 and have worked in the fields of die casting, design engineering, project engineering and product management with a focus on new product development.

[separate post]Back then the METs were forced to have to wait 7 years to take the PE test (I think). I'm not sure how that has changed these days.
Yes, an MET can "end up" in engineering jobs, but the fact of the matter is that it is a more difficult career path and there are explicit limits to how far it can take you in some directions. I know a successful engineer at about your age who is a PE and owns of an engineering company with no degree at all, but today I'm pretty sure all states requrie an engineering degree as a pre-requisite for a new PE - that's a change in the last 20 years or so. So if you want to be the president of engineering in an MEP firm, you must have an E degree. It simply can't be done with an ET degree anymore (barring some very odd inverted responsibility situation such as a 40 year old PE doing the drawing stamping for a 60 year old president of engineering who has no official responsibility). In other words, someone starting out with an MET degree was better-off 40 years ago than one starting off with an MET today. Some of the career paths available then have since been closed.

You're taking this issue personally, but you shouldn't. We're talking about general realities, here, not about individual cases. I know of a guy who didn't finish college and went on to be the richest man in the world - that doesn't mean that people shouldn't finish college. The general reality is that an ME degree is more advanced than an MET degree and will tend be viewed that way by people doing the hiring - particularly for the first few years of one's career. It's a competitive market and it's easy for a computer to filter-out applicants who don't meet the minimum requirement for a job.

I also didn't see salary data posted anywhere above. Here's some:
MET: $43,144 - $69,090
http://www.payscale.com/research/US/Job=Mechanical_Engineering_Technologist/Salary
ME: $52,046 - $73,024
http://www.payscale.com/research/US/Job=Mechanical_Engineer/Salary

You can get more specific with a search, too.
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 62 ·
3
Replies
62
Views
10K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
7K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 33 ·
2
Replies
33
Views
5K
  • · Replies 39 ·
2
Replies
39
Views
7K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
Replies
5
Views
4K