Mean value of the nuclear tensor operator

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The mean value of the nuclear tensor operator S12, defined as S12 = (3/r²)(\vec{r} \cdot \vec{S}_{1})(\vec{r} \cdot \vec{S}_{2}), is proven to be zero in all directions r. This conclusion is derived from the integral J(S1, S2) = ∫ dΩ (hat{r} · S1)(hat{r} · S2), which is shown to be proportional to the scalar product S1 · S2. The constant C is determined to be 4π/3 by evaluating the integral for the case where S1 and S2 are aligned along the z-axis, leading to the final result that ⟨(3/r²)(\vec{r} \cdot \vec{S}_{1})(\vec{r} \cdot \vec{S}_{2})⟩ = ⟨S1 · S2⟩.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of quantum mechanics, specifically spin operators.
  • Familiarity with tensor operators in quantum physics.
  • Knowledge of spherical harmonics and angular integrals.
  • Proficiency in vector calculus and scalar products.
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of tensor operators in quantum mechanics.
  • Learn about angular momentum and its representation in quantum systems.
  • Explore the mathematical techniques for evaluating angular integrals.
  • Investigate the implications of spin interactions in nuclear physics.
USEFUL FOR

Physicists, particularly those specializing in nuclear and quantum mechanics, as well as students and researchers interested in the mathematical foundations of spin interactions and tensor operators.

kvothe18
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Does anyone know how can you prove that the mean value of the tensor operator S12 in all directions r is zero?

S12 : http://prntscr.com/j3gn40

where s1, s2 are the spin operators of two nucleons.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
It is linear in the individual spins. You can split one into an orthogonal and a parallel component (relative to the other). I would expect that it is easy to show based on that.
 
kvothe18 said:
Does anyone know how can you prove that the mean value of the tensor operator S12 in all directions r is zero?

S12 : http://prntscr.com/j3gn40

where s1, s2 are the spin operators of two nucleons.
[tex]\langle \frac{3}{r^{2}} ( \vec{r} \cdot \vec{S}_{1}) ( \vec{r} \cdot \vec{S}_{2} ) \rangle = \frac{1}{4 \pi} \int d \Omega \frac{3}{r^{2}} \ ( \vec{r} \cdot \vec{S}_{1} ) ( \vec{r} \cdot \vec{S}_{2} ) = \frac{3}{4 \pi} \int d \Omega \ ( \hat{r} \cdot \vec{S}_{1}) ( \hat{r} \cdot \vec{S}_{2} ) .[/tex] Now, the integral [tex]J (S_{1} , S_{2}) \equiv \int d \Omega \left( \hat{r} \cdot \vec{S}_{1} \right) \left( \hat{r} \cdot \vec{S}_{2} \right) \ ,[/tex] is scalar and linear in [itex]\vec{S}_{1}[/itex] and [itex]\vec{S}_{2}[/itex]. So it must be proportional to the scalar product [itex]\vec{S}_{1} \cdot \vec{S}_{2}[/itex], i.e., [tex]J (S_{1} , S_{2}) = C \ \vec{S}_{1} \cdot \vec{S}_{2} .[/tex] To find the constant [itex]C[/itex], consider the special case [itex]\vec{S}_{1} = \vec{S}_{2} = \hat{z}[/itex]: [tex]C \ \hat{z} \cdot \hat{z} = J (\hat{z} , \hat{z}) = \int d \Omega \left( \hat{r} \cdot \hat{z}\right)^{2} = \int d \Omega \cos^{2} \theta .[/tex] This gives you [itex]C = \frac{4 \pi}{3}[/itex] and, therefore, [tex]J(S_{1},S_{2}) = \frac{4 \pi}{3} \vec{S}_{1} \cdot \vec{S}_{2} = \frac{4 \pi}{3}\langle \vec{S}_{1} \cdot \vec{S}_{2} \rangle . \ \ \ \ (2)[/tex] The last equality follows because [itex]\langle \vec{A} \cdot \vec{B} \rangle = \frac{1}{4 \pi} \int d \Omega \ \vec{A} \cdot \vec{B} = \vec{A} \cdot \vec{B}[/itex].

Substituting (2) in the first equation of this post, you find

[tex]\langle \frac{3}{r^{2}} ( \vec{r} \cdot \vec{S}_{1} ) ( \vec{r} \cdot \vec{S}_{2}) \rangle = \langle ( \vec{S}_{1} \cdot \vec{S}_{2} ) \rangle .[/tex]
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: nrqed and mfb

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
4K
  • · Replies 32 ·
2
Replies
32
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
7K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K