Mean Value Theorem/Rolle's Theorem and differentiability

Click For Summary
The function f(x) = 1 - x^(2/3) satisfies f(-1) = f(1) = 0, but it lacks a point c in the interval (-1, 1) where f'(c) = 0 due to f not being differentiable at x = 0. This nondifferentiability means that the conditions for Rolle's Theorem are not fully met, as the theorem requires the function to be continuous and differentiable on the closed interval. The derivative f' = (2/3)x^(-1/3) indicates that f' is undefined at x = 0, confirming the absence of a valid c. Therefore, the situation does not contradict Rolle's Theorem because the function does not satisfy all necessary hypotheses.
NanaToru
Messages
24
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Let f(x) = 1 - x2/3. Show that f(-1) = f(1) but there is no number c in (-1,1) such that f'(c) = 0. Why does this not contradict Rolle's Theorem?

Homework Equations

The Attempt at a Solution


f(x) = 1 - x2/3.
f(-1) = 1 - 1 = 0
f(1) = 1 - 1 = 0

f' = 2/3 x -1/3.

I don't understand why this doesn't have a number c in f'(c), or why Rolle's theorem excludes nondifferentiable points?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
NanaToru said:

Homework Statement


Let f(x) = 1 - x2/3. Show that f(-1) = f(1) but there is no number c in (-1,1) such that f'(c) = 0. Why does this not contradict Rolle's Theorem?

Homework Equations

The Attempt at a Solution


f(x) = 1 - x2/3.
f(-1) = 1 - 1 = 0
f(1) = 1 - 1 = 0

f' = 2/3 x -1/3.

I don't understand why this doesn't have a number c in f'(c), or why Rolle's theorem excludes nondifferentiable points?
For a function to violate Rolle's theorem, it would need to do two things:
1. Satisfy all the hypotheses of Rolle's theorem.
2. Fail to satisfy the conclusion of Rolle's theorem.

Does this function do those two things?
 
  • Like
Likes NanaToru
Hm... I'm not sure it satisfies all the hypotheses--from what the back of the book says, it isn't differentiate on the interval of (-1, 1) but I'm not sure how? Did I do a bad job differentiating it?
 
What do you get for f'(0)?
 
Is it not 0? Or is that not a valid answer?
 
NanaToru said:
Is it not 0? Or is that not a valid answer?
If you think ##\frac 1 0 = 0## then you must also think ##0\cdot 0 = 1##?
 
...This is honestly the most embarrassing moment of my life. Thank you though!
 
NanaToru said:
...This is honestly the most embarrassing moment of my life. Thank you though!
Just wait!
 
  • Like
Likes WWGD

Similar threads

Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
1K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
2K