Meaning of coefficients in polynomial potential for scalar field

Click For Summary
The discussion focuses on the implications of coefficients in polynomial potential for scalar fields, specifically examining the coefficient ##c_2## in relation to the equation of motion for a plane wave. The derived relationship shows that the group velocity is dependent on ##c_2##, which must be non-positive to maintain causality. It is suggested that ##c_2## is linked to the mass of the field, as a massless field would propagate at light speed. The analysis concludes that ##c_2## has units of m##^{-2}##, leading to the conclusion that ##c_2 = -\frac{m^2}{2}## when considering the relationship with momentum. Overall, the interpretation of ##c_2## and its physical significance in the context of scalar fields is clarified.
PhysicsRock
Messages
121
Reaction score
19
Homework Statement
For a potential ##V(\phi) = \sum_{k=0}^N c_k \phi^k##, we set ##c_k = 0## for all ##k \neq 2##. What is the physical meaning of ##c_2##?
Relevant Equations
Equation of motion ##\partial_\mu \partial^\mu \phi = 2c_2 \phi##.
For the solution of the equation of motion, we take a plane wave ##\phi(x) = e^{ik_\mu x^\mu}##. Plugged in, we obtain

$$
-(k_0)^2 + (\vec{k})^2 = 2c_2 \Rightarrow k_\mu k^\mu = 2c_2
$$

One can then find the group velocity (using ##(k_0)^2 = \omega^2##) to be

$$
\vec{v}_g = \frac{\vec{k}}{\sqrt{ \vec{k}^2 - 2c_2 }}
$$

which does not break causality only if ##c_2 \leq 0##. This leads to the assumption, at least from my perspective, that ##c_2## must be related to the mass / be the mass of the field, since if ##m = 0##, the field would propagate at the speed of light. However, using ##2c_2 = k_\mu k^\mu##, we can see that ##c_2## must have the same unit as ##k_\mu k^\mu##, i.e. m##^{-2}## in S.I. units.

Did I make a mistake along the way or am I misinterpreting the meaning of ##c_2 \leq 0##? Help is highly appreciated.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I think I've figured it out. We can set ##c = \hbar = 1##. Then ##p^\mu = k^\mu##, which implies ##k_\mu k^\mu = p_\mu p^\mu = p^2 = -m^2##. Thus, we get ##2c_2 = -m^2 \Leftrightarrow c_2 = -\frac{m^2}{2}##.
 
At first, I derived that: $$\nabla \frac 1{\mu}=-\frac 1{{\mu}^3}\left((1-\beta^2)+\frac{\dot{\vec\beta}\cdot\vec R}c\right)\vec R$$ (dot means differentiation with respect to ##t'##). I assume this result is true because it gives valid result for magnetic field. To find electric field one should also derive partial derivative of ##\vec A## with respect to ##t##. I've used chain rule, substituted ##\vec A## and used derivative of product formula. $$\frac {\partial \vec A}{\partial t}=\frac...